教學大綱 Syllabus

科目名稱:印太區域發展

Course Name: Regional Development in Indo-Pacific

修別:選

Type of Credit: Elective

3.0

學分數

Credit(s)

10

預收人數

Number of Students

課程資料Course Details

課程簡介Course Description

The course provides a comprehensive examination on major security issues in Asia-Pacific. The course begins with a broad overview of security environment in the region and is followed by discussions of major security issues. Greater discussions will be practiced in the course by assigning students to certain states or roles and encouraging them to make decisions during security crisis.

核心能力分析圖 Core Competence Analysis Chart

能力項目說明


    課程目標與學習成效Course Objectives & Learning Outcomes

    • To have a solid knowledge of the main issues and trends in Asia-Pacific, foreign policy, culture and society, the significant developments, the impact of the recent changes, the most updated academic discussions, and the leading scholars and their work in this field.
    • Understand and corelate the present regional geopolitics to Asia-Pacific and the world.
    • Introduction of Asia-Pacific region and its importance to the world through several guest lectures, field visit (potential), and simulation exercises.

    課程屬性Course Characteristics

    級分說明 Score Description:

    1關聯性最弱,2關聯性稍弱,3關聯性中等,4關聯性稍強,5關聯性最強。(1-5非百分比,而是Rank)

    1 indicates weakest relevance, 2 indicates slightly weaker relevance, 3 indicates moderate relevance, 4 indicates slightly stronger relevance, and 5 indicates strongest relevance. (1-5 does not represent a certain percentage but indicates the rank).

    課程屬性項目Course Characteristics Items 級分(1~5)Ranking 說明Description
    課程教學內容涉及學生人文關懷素養與態度之培養。 The course contents include the development of students' abilities and appreciation for humanistic care.
    課程教學包含不同學門、領域之內容。 The courses include contents from different disciplines and fields.
    課程教學內容涉及社會參與、服務等。 The course contents include social engagement and services.
    係統整與深化學生歷年所學,並運用於實務操作與討論,藉以檢視和評估學生的整體學習成效。 The courses are designed to integrate and intensify students' academic results from previous years and apply them in practice and discussions for the purpose of reviewing and evaluating the overall effectiveness of students' learning.
    課程主軸明確探討永續性之統整概念及/或聯合國永續發展目標及/或「生態」與「社會/文化/經濟」系統之間的相互依賴性。關聯度級分請點選連結說明。 A unit of instruction that has a primary and explicit focus on the integrated concept of sustainability, and/or UN Sustainable Development Goals, and/or the interdependence of ecological and social/cultural/economic systems. Please refer to the link of relevance score.
    課程內容旨在教授媒體、網路相關專業資訊之真偽辨別與判讀能力。 The course would provide skills to evaluate the quality of information found on the media and the Internet.
    將 AI 知能運用融入課程,引導師生與 AI 共學、協作,多元培養學生 AI 素養。 Integrate the application of AI knowledge into the curriculum, lead teachers and students to learn and collaborate with AI, and cultivate students' AI literacy.

    每周課程進度與作業要求 Course Schedule & Requirements

    Week

    Topic

    Content and Reading Assignment

    Teaching Activities and Homework

    W1,

    September 7

    Introduction to the class

    Introducing the class and objectives and background of the region

    David Shambaugh, (2014) “International Relations in Asia: A multidimensional analysis,” in David Shambaugh and Michael Yahuda, eds. International Relations of Asia, 2nd ed. Chapter 1,2 and 3. Lanham & Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W2, September 14

    Shaping of APAC Security-1

    Korean War to Indo-China War: Decolonization and Bipolarization

    1. Yahuda, Michael (2004) “The International Politics of the Asia-Pacific”, London, Routledge, 2nd edition.
    2. Hara, Kimie, (1999) “Rethinking the Cold War in the Asia-Pacific’, The Pacific Review, Vol. 12 (4).
    3. Kuhonta, Slater and Vu (2008) “Introduction: The Contributions of Southeast Asian Political Studies” in Kuhonta, Slater and Vu eds. Southeast Asia in Political Science: Theory, Region and Qualitative Analysis, Stanford University Press, Chp.1

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W3, September 21

    Shaping of APAC Security: 2

    From 2nd Indo-China War to Tiananmen Square: End of Cold War and Rise of Globalization

    1. Yahuda, Michael (2004) “The International Politics of the Asia-Pacific”, London, Routledge, 2nd edition 2004. , Chapter 10

    b. Hughes, Christopher W. (2001), ‘Conceptualizing the globalization-security nexus in the Asia-Pacific’, Security Dialogue, Vol. 32 (4).

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W4, September 28

    University Day Off

    W5, October 5

    Theories of Conflict and Security in the APAC-1

    Structural Realism

    1. Friedberg, Aaron (1993/1994) “Ripe for rivalry: prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia’, International Security, Vol.18 (3).

    b. Acharya, Amitav (2008) "Theoretical Perspectives on International Relations in Asia." In International Relations of Asia, edited by David Shambaugh and Michael Yahuda, 57‐82. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W6, October 12

    Theories of Conflict and Security in the APAC-2

    Liberalism and Constructivism

    1. Berger, Tom (2000) ‘Set for stability? Prospects for conflict and cooperation in East Asia’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 26

    b. Friedberg, Aaron, (2005) ‘The future of US-China relations: is conflict inevitable?’, International Security, Vol. 30 (2).

     

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W7, October 19

    Theories of Conflict and Security in the APAC-3

    Critical Security, Human Security

    1. McDonald, Matt, (2002) “Human security and the construction of security’, Global Society, Vol. 16 (3).

    b. Burke, Anthony, (2007) “What makes security possible: some thoughts on Critical Security Studies” Department of International Relations Working Paper, Australian National University, Available at: http://rspas.anu.edu.au/ir/pubs/work_papers/07-1.pdf 

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W8, October 26

    University Day Off

    W9, November 2

    Documentary/Guest Lecture

    W10, November 9

    Asian Countries: 1

    Is China is having a Peaceful Rise?

    1. Guoguang Wu. (2015) “Protests against Prosperity: The Recurring Chinese Dilemma of Economic Achievement vs. Political Discontent” Modern China Studies Vol. 22 (2).
    2. Kwong, Ying-ho. (2016) “The Growth of ‘localism’ in Hong Kong-A New Path for the Democracy Movement?” China Perspectives. Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine  

    c. Schweller, Randall L., and Xiaoyu Pu. (2011). After Unipolarity: China's Visions of International Order in Era of U.S. Decline. International Security 36 (1)

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W11, November 16

    Asian Countries: 2

    India: Friend to the world?

    Possible Guest Lecture

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W12, November 23

    South China Sea

    Territorial Disputes and Security

    1. Wu, Der-yuan (2008) “Maintaining Status Quo across the Taiwan Strait: A Constructivist/Institutionalist Perspective” Issues & Studies. 44 (1).

    b. Gill, Bates (2007) “Rising Star: China’s New Security Diplomacy”, Washington DC, Brookings Institution Press

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W13, November 30

    Major Powers in Asia

    U.S and other Military Power and Regional Partners

    a) Sutter, Robert. (2008). "The United States in Asia: Challenged but Durable Leadership." In International Relations of Asia, eds. David Shambaugh and Micheal Yahuda. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 85‐103.

    b) Ikenberry, G. John. (2008) "The Political Foundations of American Relations with East Asia." In The United States and Northeast Asia: Debates, Issues, and New Order, eds. G. John Ikenberry and Chung‐in Moon. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 19‐37.

    c) Jeremy Patiel. (2016) “Resolute Ambivalence: Canada’s Strategy toward China and Asia Pacific” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 22 (1)

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W14, December 7

    Multilateral Groups and Nuclear Arms Race

    Can Quad be a reality? And Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Race

    1. Graham, Euan; Pan, Chengxin; Hall, Ian; Kersten, Rikki; Zala, Benjamin and Percy, Sarah (2018), “Debating the Quad” The Centre of Gravity Series, Australia National University.
    2. Panda, Jagannath P. (2018), “India’s Call on China in the Quad: A Strategic Arch between Liberal and Alternative Structures” Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA), New Delhi

    c. Buchman, Patrick Gerard (2020), “Defining the Diamond: The Past, Present, and Future of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue” Center for Strategic and International Studies. Available at https://www.csis.org/analysis/defining-diamond-past-present-and-future-quadrilateral-security-dialogue

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W15, December 14

    Simulation-1

    Simulation Exercise 1

    Lecture and Class discussion

    W16, December 21

    Simulation-2

    Simulation Exercise 2

    Lecture and Class discussion

    授課方式Teaching Approach

    50%

    講述 Lecture

    20%

    討論 Discussion

    20%

    小組活動 Group activity

    10%

    數位學習 E-learning

    0%

    其他: Others:

    評量工具與策略、評分標準成效Evaluation Criteria

    Participation and Discussion

    20%

    Class Presentation and Report

    20%

    Simulation Exercise

    20%

    Final Exam

    40%

    指定/參考書目Textbook & References

    已申請之圖書館指定參考書目 圖書館指定參考書查詢 |相關處理要點

    維護智慧財產權,務必使用正版書籍。 Respect Copyright.

    課程AI能力關聯Course–AI Competency Relevance

    級分說明 Score Description:

    0:無關聯,課程內容、活動及評量均未涉及。
    1:極低關聯,僅於課堂中簡單提及,未安排學習活動。
    2:低度關聯,少數單元或活動涉及,但非主要教學內容。
    3:中度關聯,明確納入部分教學活動、作業或評量。
    4:高度關聯,為重要學習內容,融入多數教學活動或評量。
    5:核心關聯,為課程核心學習目標,且有系統性教學與評量。
    0:No relevance: The course content, learning activities, and assessments do not address this competency.
    1:Very low relevance: The competency is only briefly mentioned in class, with no related learning activities.
    2:Low relevance: The competency is addressed in a small number of units or activities but is not a major component of the course.
    3:Moderate relevance: The competency is explicitly incorporated into some learning activities, assignments, or assessments.
    4:High relevance: The competency is an important learning component and is integrated into most learning activities or assessments.
    5:Core relevance: The competency is a core learning objective of the course and is addressed through systematic instruction and assessment.
    課程AI能力項目Course–AI Competency Items 級分(0~5)Ranking 說明Description
    本課程培養學生依專業或學習需求,理解、選用及運用AI工具,進行資訊整理、資料產出、提問與自主學習的程度。 This course develops students'ability to understand, select, and use AI tools according to their disciplinary or learning needs for information organization, data or content generation, inquiry, and self-directed learning.
    本課程培養學生遵循學術誠信、智慧財產權、個人資料及相關倫理規範,並辨識AI偏誤、錯誤資訊與資安風險的程度。 This course develops students’ ability to comply with academic integrity, intellectual property, personal data protection, and relevant ethical requirements, as well as to identify AI bias, misinformation, and cybersecurity risks.
    本課程培養學生運用AI分析問題、整合專業知識、優化流程,並透過人機協作提出、驗證及修正解決方案的程度。 This course develops students’ ability to use AI to analyze problems, integrate disciplinary knowledge, optimize processes, and propose, validate, and refine solutions through human–AI collaboration.
    本課程培養學生自主判斷、承擔責任、溝通協作、同理關懷、多元思考及創意實踐等以人為本能力的程度。 This course develops students’ human-centered competencies, including independent judgment, accountability, communication and collaboration, empathy and care, diverse perspectives, and creative practice.

    本課程可否使用生成式AI工具Course Policies on the Use of Generative AI Tools

    本課程無涉及AI使用 This Course Does Not Involve the Use of AI.

    課程相關連結Course Related Links

    
                

    課程附件Course Attachments

    課程進行中,使用智慧型手機、平板等隨身設備 To Use Smart Devices During the Class

    否 No

    列印