教學大綱 Syllabus

科目名稱:公共政策分析與倡議

Course Name: Public Policy Analysis and Advocacy

修別:選

Type of Credit: Elective

3.0

學分數

Credit(s)

30

預收人數

Number of Students

課程資料Course Details

課程簡介Course Description

This course introduces the foundational concepts and practical approaches in public policy analysis and advocacy. Public policy is any decisions and actions (or indecisions and inactions) of governments. Public policy analysis is a tool to inform policymakers’ decisions, and policy advocacy is the technique to engage with stakeholders and communicate with the public to pursue the policy change. This course will cover key stages in policy analysis and advocacy, such as problem identification, policy formulation, decision-making, advocacy, and adoption. Through case-based learning and theoretical grounding, students will explore how policy problems are defined, options developed and evaluated, and stakeholder interests negotiated. Students will complete a comprehensive policy analysis project and participate in a mock press conference, developing analytical, communication, and civic leadership skills.

核心能力分析圖 Core Competence Analysis Chart

能力項目說明


    課程目標與學習成效Course Objectives & Learning Outcomes

    By the end of the course, students will be able to:

    • Explain core concepts in public policy, including problem definition, policy formulation, and the adoption process.
    • Apply theoretical and practical tools in public policy analysis and advocacy to analyze practical problems and assess policies, such as evaluation matrices, cost-benefit analyses, and stakeholder analyses.
    • Communicate policy ideas and proposals effectively through both oral and written formats to inform policymakers and the public.

    每周課程進度與作業要求 Course Schedule & Requirements

     

    Week

    Topic

    Teaching Activities and Homework

    Part I: Introduction to Public Policy and Policy Process

    1

    Introduction: What is public policy?

     

    2

    Policy Cycle and Stages: How are public policies developed?

     

    3

    Multiple Streams: How does policy change happen?

     

    Part II: Policy Analysis: From Problem(s) to Solution(s)

    4

    Problem Identification and Agenda Setting: Who decides which issues to prioritize, and how?

     

    5

    Policy Alternatives: Where do policy options come from?

    Policy Analysis Project (1): Problem Statement. Due 10/7

    6

    Evaluation Criteria and Policy Trade-off: How to determine which option is the best one?

     

    7

    Cost-Benefit Analysis: How to weigh pros and cons?

    Peer Interaction (1): Issues Evaluation and Ranking. Due 10/21

    8

    Decision Making: How do policymakers make decisions?

     

    9

    The Limits of Policy Analysis: Can policy analysis solve everything?

    Policy Analysis Project (2): Alternatives Evaluation Due 11/4

    Part III: Policy Advocate: From Proposal to Adoption

    10

    Political Feasibility and Stakeholder Analysis: Who are the key players in the policymaking process?

     

    11

    Policy Broker vs. Entrepreneur: Who pushes the policy change?

    Peer Interaction (2): Decision Making. Due 11/18

    12

    Iron Triangle: Why is it so hard to push policy change?

     

    13

    Framing, Media, and Public Opinions: Does it matter how you describe the policy?

     

    14

    Social Constructions: Who deserves (the policy benefits)?

    Policy Analysis Project (3): Stakeholder Analysis. Due 12/9

    15

    Policy Narrative: Who are the heroes and who are the villains?

     

    16

    Presentation: Policy Advocate Press Conference

    Peer Interaction (3): Stakeholder Engagement. Due in the class or on 12/19

     

    Weekly Topics and Assigned Readings

    Part I: Introduction to Public Policy and Policy Process

    Week 1 (9/3) Introduction

    Week 2 (9/10) Policy Cycle and Stages

    Week 3 (9/17) Multiple Streams

    • How does policy change happen?
    • Readings
      • Policy Concepts in 1000 Words: Multiple Streams Analysis
      • Martin et al. Ch4.7: Policy Streams And “Windows” of Opportunity (pp.61–65)
      • Dool, A. V. D., & Schlaufer, C. (2024). The multiple streams framework beyond democracies: Reflections on existing and future research. International Review of Public Policy, 6(6:3). 1–26.

    Part II: Policy Analysis: From Problem(s) to Solution(s)

    Week 4 (9/24) Problem Identification and Agenda Setting

    • Who decides which issues to prioritize, and how?
    • Readings
      • Martin et al. Ch4.1–Ch4.9: Problem Identification and Agenda Setting (pp.53–72) & Ch7.2–7.3: The Policy Analysis Process/ Identify and Define the Problem (pp.124–126)
      • Zhang, M., Chen, Z., Liu, X., & Liu, J. (2024). Theory and practice of agenda setting: understanding media, bot, and public agendas in the South Korean presidential election. Asian Journal of Communication, 34(1), 24–56.

    Week 5 (10/1) Policy Alternatives

    • Where do policy options come from?
    • Readings
      • Martin et al. Ch1.5: Types of Public Policy (pp.5–8) & Ch7.4 Identify Alternatives (pp.126–127)
      • Holland, A. C., & Schneider, B. R. (2017). Easy and hard redistribution: The political economy of welfare states in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 15(4), 988–1006.
    • Optional Readings
      • Dubash, N. K., & Morgan, B. (2012). Understanding the rise of the regulatory state of the South. Regulation & Governance, 6(3), 261-281.
      • Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. M. (2023). Appendix B: Things Governments Do. A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. CQ Press.
    • Assignment
      • Policy Analysis Project (1): Problem Statement Due 10/7

    Week 6 (10/8) Evaluation Criteria and Policy Trade-off

    • How to determine which option is the best one?
    • Readings
      • Martin et al. Ch5.2–Ch5.6: Equity, Efficiency, Security, and Liberty (pp.81–88), Ch7.5–7.6: Establish Evaluation Criteria & Evaluate The Alternatives (pp.127–130)
      • How Should We Balance Efficiency and Equality? Chicago Booth Review.
      • Cheek, N. N., Reutskaja, E., & Schwartz, B. (2022). Balancing the freedom–security trade-off during crises and disasters. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1024-1049.

    Week 7 (10/15) Cost-benefit Analysis

    • How to weigh pros and cons?
    • Readings
      • Cellini, S. R., & Kee, J. E. (2015). Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐benefit analysis. In Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (Eds.). Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 636-672). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints, Wiley.
      • Shanahan, M., & Ritter, A. (2014). Cost benefit analysis of two policy options for cannabis: status quo and legalisation. PloS One, 9(4), e95569.
    • Assignment
      • Peer Interaction (1): Issues Evaluation and Ranking Due 10/21

    Week 8 (10/22) Decision Making

    Week 9 (10/29) The Limits of Policy Analysis

    • Can policy analysis solve everything?
    • Readings
      • Ghimire, R. P. (2006). The Limits of Analysis in Policy Making with Special Reference to the Developing Countries.
      • Turner, R. K. (2007). Limits to CBA in UK and European environmental policy: retrospects and future prospects. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 253-269.
    • Assignment
      • Policy Analysis Project (2): Alternative Evaluations Due 11/4

    Part III: Policy Advocate: From Proposal to Adoption

    Week 10 (11/5) Political Feasibility and Stakeholders Analysis

    • Who are the key players in the policymaking process?
    • Readings
    • Optional Readings
      • Gilson, L., Erasmus, E., Borghi, J., Macha, J., Kamuzora, P., & Mtei, G. (2012). Using stakeholder analysis to support moves towards universal coverage: lessons from the SHIELD project. Health Policy and Planning, 27, i64-i76.

    Week 11 (11/12) Policy Broker vs. Entrepreneur

    • Who pushes the policy change?
    • Readings
    • Optional Readings
      • Pholsim, S. (2021). How dreams are driven: An analysis of advocacy coalition framework on Khon Kaen’s light rail transit project in Thailand. Journal of Public Administration, Public Affairs, and Management, 19(2), 1–23.
    • Assignment
      • Peer Interaction (2): Decision Making Assignment Due 11/18

    Week 12 (11/19) Iron Triangle

    • Why is it so hard to push policy change?
    • Readings
    • Optional Readings
      • Andrews‐Speed, P., & Putra, N. A. (2024). Breaking the iron triangle around nuclear safety regulation: The cases of France, Japan, and India. Regulation & Governance, 18(4), 1246-1263.

    Week 13 (11/26) Framing, Media, and Public Opinions

    • Does it matter how you describe the policy?
    • Readings
      • Policy Concepts in 1000 Words: Framing
      • Wiest, S. L., Raymond, L., & Clawson, R. A. (2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 31, 187-198.
    • Optional Readings
      • Park, C., & Lee, J. (2020). Stakeholder framing, communicative interaction, and policy legitimacy: anti-smoking policy in South Korea. Policy Sciences, 53(4), 637-665.

    Week 14 (12/3) Social Constructions

    • Who deserves?
    • Readings
    • Assignment
      • Policy Analysis Project (3): Stakeholder Analysis Due 12/9

    Week 15 (12/10) Policy Narrative

    • Who are the heroes and who are the villains?
    • Readings
      • Policy in 500 Words: the Narrative Policy Framework
      • Jung, Y. H., & Huang, Z. X. (2024). Seeking the high ground: Exploring advocacy groups’ use of policy narratives in the legalization of same‐sex marriage in Taiwan. Policy Studies Journal, 52(3), 671-696.

    Week 16 (12/17) Presentation: Policy Advocate Press Conference

    • Assignments

    Peer Interaction Activity (3): Stakeholder Engagement

    授課方式Teaching Approach

    40%

    講述 Lecture

    30%

    討論 Discussion

    30%

    小組活動 Group activity

    0%

    數位學習 E-learning

    0%

    其他: Others:

    評量工具與策略、評分標準成效Evaluation Criteria

    1. Public Policy Analysis Project (40%)
      1. Problem Statement (10%). Due 10/7.
      2. Alternatives Evaluation (10%). Due. 11/4.
      3. Stakeholder Analysis (10%). Due 12/9.
      4. Oral Presentation (10%). Policy Advocate Press Conference on 12/17.
    2. Peer Interaction Activity (30%)
      1. Issues Evaluation and Ranking (10%). Due 10/21.
      2. Decision Making (10%). Due 11/18.
      3. Stakeholder Engagement (10%). Depending on class size and time, this activity may be conducted either orally during the presentation (on 12/17) or via a written survey afterward (Due 12/19).
    3. Course Participation (30%)
      1. Pre-class reading memo (20%) (Week 3 to Week 15). Due the day before the class. You get three free skips; Total 10 memos required for submission; Each memo worth 2%.
      2. Attendance in in-class participation (10%): You are allowed up to three absences without needing to provide a reason. Any additional absences must comply with the National Chengchi University Student Leave of Absence Rules (國立政治大學學生請假規則).

    Late Submission Policy: Written works are due at 23:59 on the stated date. Late submissions will lose 10 percent of the available points for each 24-hour period past the deadline, unless the instructor has approved an extension in advance or grants a waiver afterward due to an unforeseen emergency. For assignments that involve peer review, a significant delay in submission might result in losing the opportunity to get peer feedback, but the instructor would still give feedback on the assignment. For oral presentation, a missing attendance without approval and rearrangement with the instructor will result in a grade of 0.

    Guidelines for the use of Generative AI Tools in the Classroom

    • Allow the use of AI tools to assist in learning (such as summarizing reading, explaining concepts) and improve writing (such as proofreading, translating, editing suggestions, etc.). No acknowledgment required.
    • Allow the use of AI for other purposes (such as generate ideas, content, or visual design) with full acknowledgment.
    • Strictly prohibited: inputting or uploading classmates’ work into AI tools. You also may not share their work with anyone outside the class without the author’s permission. This is not an issue of AI use, but one of protecting your peers’ privacy and intellectual property rights.

    指定/參考書目Textbook & References

    Textbook: 

    All other assigned readings are available from the course website.

    已申請之圖書館指定參考書目 圖書館指定參考書查詢 |相關處理要點

    維護智慧財產權,務必使用正版書籍。 Respect Copyright.

    本課程可否使用生成式AI工具Course Policies on the Use of Generative AI Tools

    有條件開放使用:Allow the use of AI to assist learning. Using for assignments requires full acknowledgment. Strictly prohibited for use in peer review assignments. Conditional Permitted to Use

    課程相關連結Course Related Links

    
                

    課程附件Course Attachments

    課程進行中,使用智慧型手機、平板等隨身設備 To Use Smart Devices During the Class

    Yes

    列印