教學大綱 Syllabus

科目名稱:傳播理論

Course Name: Communication Theories

修別:選

Type of Credit: Elective

3.0

學分數

Credit(s)

3

預收人數

Number of Students

課程資料Course Details

課程簡介Course Description

This course is specifically designed to thoroughly explore the theoretical foundations of communication, with a particular emphasis on media effects. We will delve into how media theories interpret the historical and current roles played by mass media, digital media, and user-centric media. Moreover, we will closely examine how individuals actively engage with these multimedia platforms, emphasizing their interactive nature. In this course, you will gain a comprehensive understanding of these evolving concepts and their profound impact in today’s media landscape. Furthermore, this course will enhance your understanding of research methodology, particularly in the context of effects research. You will gain insights into the methodologies employed to study media effects, enabling you to comprehend and evaluate empirical studies.

核心能力分析圖 Core Competence Analysis Chart

能力項目說明


    課程目標與學習成效Course Objectives & Learning Outcomes

    Upon successful completion of the assigned coursework, students can expect to cultivate the following skills:
    1. Proficiency in fundamental theories related to media effects.
    2. Capability to skillfully compare theories and assess their respective strengths, considering both their logical foundations and empirical evidence.
    3. Enhanced comprehension of research methodology, particularly within the realm of effects research.

    每周課程進度與作業要求 Course Schedule & Requirements

    Week

    Topics

    Readings

    Key Concepts

    1 (9/3)

    Introduction

     

     

    2 (9/10)

    What is a theory?

    Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2021). Theories of human communication. Waveland press. (Chap 2: The idea of theories)

     

    What is a theory and how to evaluate a theory?

    3 (9/17)

    Agenda-setting & Priming

    1. Althaus, S, & Tewksbury, D. (2002) Agenda setting and the “new” news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29, 180-207.
    2. Krosnick, J. A. and Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.

     

    Different levels of agenda-setting theory

    4 (9/24)

    Framing

    Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122.

     

    Comparing framing with agenda-setting and priming

    5 (10/1)

    Information processing/ Mental models

    Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2011). The elaboration likelihood model. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1, 224-245.

     

    Elaboration Likelihood Model

    6 (10/8)

    Motivated reasoning

    1. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological bulletin108(3), 480.
    2. Kraft, P. W., Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2015). Why people “don’t trust the evidence” motivated reasoning and scientific beliefs. The ANNALS of the American Academy of political and social science658(1), 121-133.

    Exploring topic: Is correction an effective approach to reducing the impact of false information?

    7(10/15)

    Deliberation/ Discussion

    Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Talk or conversation? Dimensions of interpersonal discussion and their implications for participatory democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 727-743.

     

    Understanding the concepts of deliberation, discussion, and heterogeneous talk

    8 (10/22)

    Communication mediation model

    Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an OSROR model of communication effects. Communication theory, 19(1), 66-88.

     

    OSOR model and OSROR model as an extension of the communication mediation model

    9 (10/29)

    Guest lecture + final paper idea presentation

    Prof. Hsuan-Ting Chen, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

     

    Current research

    • Online political expression
    • Selective Exposure
    • Cross-Cutting Exposure

     

    Online

    10 (11/5)

    Social capital

    Gil de Zúñiga, H. & Valenzuela, S. (2010.) Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement: The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks. Communication Research, 20, p. 1-25.

     

    Two types of social capital and links

    11 (11/12)

    Cultivation

    Dudo, A., Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., Scheufele, D. A., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (2011). Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research, 38(6), 754-777.

     

    Where is our impression of the social actors from?

    12 (11/19)

    Self-efficacy

    Tabernero, C., & Hernández, B. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior43(5), 658-675.

     

    Social cognition theory

    13 (11/26)

    Theories about emotions

    Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329-349.

     

    EPPM, Affect heuristic

    14 (12/3)

    Final poster presentation

     

     

    15 (12/10)

    Final poster presentation

     

     

    16 (12/17)

    Final paper due

     

     

    Due on Moodle by 5:00 pm

    授課方式Teaching Approach

    20%

    講述 Lecture

    30%

    討論 Discussion

    50%

    小組活動 Group activity

    0%

    數位學習 E-learning

    0%

    其他: Others:

    評量工具與策略、評分標準成效Evaluation Criteria

    1. Attendance, 10%
    2. Class participation, 10%
    3. Discussion leading, 40%
      Class participants will select a topic and serve as discussion leaders for a week of their choice. This is assignment is designed to be a collaborative group activity. The readings outlined in the weekly schedule represent the foundational works in their respective fields. However, as discussion leaders, it is expected that you supplement these seminal readings with at least two more recent and relevant studies. These additional studies should be shared with the class one week prior to the presentation.
    4. Final paper, 40% (Late submission will not be considered)

    The key capstone of this course will be a theoretical paper, which is comprehensive literature review. The theoretical paper focuses solely on the exploration of a research topic through an in-depth examination of existing literature, without involving any methodology. This is also a collaborative group activity. The length of the final paper is 3,000-3,500 words.

    指定/參考書目Textbook & References

    已申請之圖書館指定參考書目 圖書館指定參考書查詢 |相關處理要點

    維護智慧財產權,務必使用正版書籍。 Respect Copyright.

    本課程可否使用生成式AI工具Course Policies on the Use of Generative AI Tools

    有條件開放使用:Students may use AI tools for assistance usch as editing, finding relevant literature, or exploring potential explanations. However, generating text with AI for any class assignments are prohibited. Conditional Permitted to Use

    課程相關連結Course Related Links

    
                

    課程附件Course Attachments

    課程進行中,使用智慧型手機、平板等隨身設備 To Use Smart Devices During the Class

    需經教師同意始得使用 Approval

    列印