教學大綱 Syllabus

科目名稱:亞洲主權:人類學視角

Course Name: Sovereignty in Asia: Anthropological Perspectives

修別:選

Type of Credit: Elective

3.0

學分數

Credit(s)

10

預收人數

Number of Students

課程資料Course Details

課程簡介Course Description

Course Description:

This class will examine the institution of sovereign rule from the bottom up, taking stock of the emergence of ancient states and attending to three distinct, but shifting registers in which sovereignty emerges in modern formations. One addresses the nation-state as a territorially and ideologically bounded entity, another engages with indigenous understandings of social relationships with the earth, which folds into the third register of Indigenous People’s sovereign claims to territory. To unpack these interconnected strands, we begin by examining ancient sovereigns form from East and Southeast Asia using anthropological and archeological data to complicate the story of civilization. We will attend to god kings and emperors, as well as the modern forms of territorial control that emerged from those ancient states. With this, we will turn the assumption of teleological progress into a question. Is the institution of the sovereign nation part of an evolutionary process of human social life? To address this question, we turn to the cults of soil and water common to indigenous communities across the region. There are elements of these practices that are directly connected to ancient forms of sovereignty. Part of our work will be to identify this connective tissue, as well as what possibilities are severed in the shift to sovereignty. From this perspective, we can follow the trail of sovereignty as it emerges out of the resources it consumes and, in this context, will consider the contested spaces where contemporary Indigenous Peoples make sovereign claims. The purpose of this examination is to consider alternative ways to frame contemporary questions about territory, resources, and the organization of place and society. We will ask more questions than we answer in this class, and participants should come prepared to think together about the creative process of social organization.

核心能力分析圖 Core Competence Analysis Chart

能力項目說明


    課程目標與學習成效Course Objectives & Learning Outcomes

    Course Objectives:

    • In the context of changing planetary systems and unchanging political and economic activities, students will understand some of the historical processes that inform our current challenges
    • Students will understand the history and development of modern sovereign nations
    • Students will be able to make connections between sovereign nations and the geo-bio processes that sustain them
    • Sovereign claims by Indigenous Peoples will be understood in the context of their deep history.

     

    Three-credit course

    To achieve the three-credit course requirement, this course offers at least 54 hours of instruction.

    We will meet physically in class for 3-hour sessions weekly (42 hours). Week 8 is a mid-term take-home exam. Week 16 is the final take-home exam.

    Office hour instruction is offered each week (3 hours/wk. adding 48 hours of additional instruction opportunities).  

     

    Class Participation

    Show up, on time, prepared to discuss the week’s readings. Computers or cell phones are for note taking, translation assistance, or researching course-related things. Do not do other work during class time. Be respectful of others’ opinions, share interesting things related to the discussion, be mindful of others who may be more shy than you. Students are invited to prepare presentations for class related to course material or to their own explorations of sovereignty. Presentations will be considered extra credit toward enhancing the class participation grade.

     

    Midterm Exam

    Short answer, open book essay exam. You will be provided 6 questions, you will choose 4 and write no more than 1000 words to answer each question. Your answers should be in the form of an academic argument, not a summary, and will be graded on the demonstrated understanding of the material.

     

    Final Paper

    Write 15-20 pages on a topic related to the course materials and your own research project. This will be graded on the extent to which it makes an original argument, attends to course materials, has a sophisticated literature review, and provides convincing evidence in support of the argument. The paper should be in a formal academic style and should be considered a draft essay for a journal publication.

     

    Pop Quiz

    At random moments during the course, the professor will announce a pop quiz. Students will be given 15 min at the beginning of class to answer a question related to the week’s readings. Quizzes are scored on a 10-point scale according to the extent to which the question is answered and the student demonstrates having read and understood the assignment.

    每周課程進度與作業要求 Course Schedule & Requirements

    Course Schedule

     

    Introducing basic concepts

    1. Course Intro-
      1. The inevitability of the nation state
        1. Why we need new ideas about sovereignty- resources, water, and land
        2. In class writing- what is sovereignty?

    Early Adventures in Sovereign Land Claims: The God King and Son of Heaven

    1. Early Kings- Foundations, Violence, and “Superstition”
      1. Graeber, D., & Sahlins, M. (2017). On Kings. Hau Books. [Introduction, Ch. 1]
      1. Sima Qian. (2007). The First Emperor. Oxford University Press. [Introductions, Ch. 1 and 5]
      2. Mus, P. (1933). [1975] India Seen from the East: Indian and indigenous cults in Champa. Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University.
    1. China – Queens, Emperors, and Nomads
      1. Lewis, M. E. (2007). The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [pp. 1-29;178-205; Geography of Empire; Religion].
      2. MacKay, Joseph. 2020. Imperial Chinese Relations with Nomadic Groups. In, Nomad-State Relationships in International Relations: Before and After Borders. Edited by Jamie Levin. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28053-6.
    2. Southeast Asia- Devaraja to Chakravartan
      1. Heine-Geldern, R. (1942). Conceptions of the State and Kingship in Southeast Asia. The Far Eastern Quarterly, 2(1), 15–30.
      2. Day, Tony. 2002. Fluid Iron: State Formation in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. [Ch. 1 & 3]
    1. Sovereignty and Religion
      1. McAllister, C., & Napolitano, V. (2021). Political Theology/Theopolitics: The Thresholds and Vulnerabilities of Sovereignty. Annual Review of Anthropology, 50, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110334
      2. Yongqian, Su, and Kathryn Henderson. 2017. “An Exploration of the Queen Mother of the West from the Perspective of Comparative Mythology.” Journal of Chinese Humanities 3 (1): 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1163/23521341-12340044.
      3. Thompson, A. (2016). Engendering the Buddhist State: Territory, Sovereignty and Sexual Difference in the Inventions of Angkor. London: Routledge. [Introduction Presis 2, pp. 2-18; Chapter 2, 71-110]

     

    Sovereignty and Europe

    1. European model of sovereignty and modernity
      1. Bodin, Jean. 2009. On Sovereignty: Six Books of the Commonwealth. Oxford: The Alden Press. [Book 1]
      2. Croxton, Derek. 1999. “The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and the Origins of Sovereignty. The International History Review 21 (3): 569–91.
      3. Lopez, Julia Costa, Benjamin De Carvalho, Andrew A. Latham, Ayse Zarakol, Jens Bartelson, and Minda Holm. 2018. “Forum: In the Beginning There Was No Word (For It): Terms, Concepts, and Early Sovereignty.” International Studies Review 20 (3): 489–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/ISR/VIY053.
    2. Sovereign Exception and the Nomos of the Earth
      1. Schmitt, C. (1950). The Nomos of the Earth: in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Telos Press Publishing. [Part 1: pp. 42-86]
      2. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press. [pp 1-67- Introduction and Part 1]
      3. Lee, Seung Ook, Najeeb Jan, and Joel Wainwright. 2014. “Agamben, Postcoloniality, and Sovereignty in South Korea.” Antipode 46 (3): 650–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12070.

    8- Mid-Term Exam-

            Short answer essays dealing with the framing of the course and main concepts

     

    Sovereignty and Colonization  

    1. Mainland Southeast Asia –  Sovereign Thailand
      1. Thongchai, Winichakul. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. [Intro, Ch. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 7] 
    1. East and South Asia
      1. Chen, Edward I-te. 1970. “Japanese Colonialism in Korea and Formosa: A Comparison of the Systems of Political Control.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 30: 126–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2718768.pdf.
      2. Kohno, M. (2001). On the Meiji Restoration: Japan’s search for sovereignty? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific1, 265–283.
      3. Hansen, Thomas Blom. 2021. “Sovereignty in a Minor Key.” Public Culture 33 (1): 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-8742160.

    Trade-Sovereignty-Energy: Before (or without) the Kings

    1. General Concepts: Founders, Zomia, and the land between the kings
      1. O’Connor, R. A. (2003). Founder’s Cults in Regional and Historical Perspective. In N. Tannenbaum &C. A. Kammerer (Eds.), Founders’ Cults in Southeast Asia: Ancestors, Polity, and Identity (pp. 269–311). Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.
      2. Scott, J. C. (2009). The Art of not being Governed: an anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press. [Preface and Introduction]
      3. Baumann, B. (2020). Reconceptualizing the Cosmic Polity: The Tai mueang as a social ontology. In B. Baumann & D. Bultmann (Eds.), Social Ontology, Sociocultures, and Inequality in the Global South. Routledge.

    Sovereignty Reconsidered

    1. Sovereignty and Contemporary Indigenous Movements [
      1. Marisol de La Cadena & Orin Starn. 2007. Indigenous Experience Today (Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series). New York: Berg Publishers. [Introduction and Chapter 7]
      2. Bauder, Harald, and Rebecca Mueller. 2021. “Westphalian Vs. Indigenous Sovereignty: Challenging Colonial Territorial Governance.” Geopolitics 00 (00): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1920577.
      3. Mignolo, Walter D. 2021. The Politics of Decolonial Investigations. Durham and London: Duke University Press. [Chapter 14]
    2. Sovereignty and Territory
      1. Menshawy, Mustafa. 2019. “Constructing State, Territory, and Sovereignty in the Syrian Conflict.” Politics 39 (3): 332–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718770
      2. Ginoza, Ayano. 2012. “Space of ‘ Militourism ’: Intimacies of U.S. and Japanese Empires and Indigenous Sovereignty in Okinawa.” International Journal of Okinawan Studies 3 (1): 7–23. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12000/34106 .
      3. Longkumer, Arkotong. 2020. “Indigenous Futures: The Practice of Sovereignty in Nagaland and Other Places.” In Indigenous Religion(s): Local Grounds, Global Networks, edited by Siv Ellen Kraft, Bjørn Ola Tafjord, Arkotong Longkumer, Gregory D. Alles, and Greg Johnson. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021513.
    3. Which Sovereign; Which exception?
      1. Povinelli, E. A. 2016. Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Duke University Press. [pp. 30-56; 92-118; Can Rocks Die? Life and Death inside the Carbon Imaginary; The Normativity of Creeks]
      2. Boelens, R., Escobar, A., Bakker, K., Hommes, L., Swyngedouw, E., Hogenboom, B., Huijbens, E. H., Jackson, S., Vos, J., Harris, L. M., Joy, K. J., Castro, F. de, Duarte-Abadía, B., Souza, D. T. de, Lotz-Sisitka, H., Hernández-Mora, N., Martínez-Alier, J., Roca-Servat, D., Perreault, T., … Wantzen, K. M. 2023. Riverhood: political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice. Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(3), 1125–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810
      3. Matthews, Daniel. 2021. “Reframing Sovereignty for the Anthropocene.” Transnational Legal Theory 12 (1): 44–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2021.1929022.
    4. Course Review
    1. Final Exam week – no class- Final paper due 5pm Dec 19 (last day of exam week).

    授課方式Teaching Approach

    30%

    講述 Lecture

    70%

    討論 Discussion

    0%

    小組活動 Group activity

    0%

    數位學習 E-learning

    0%

    其他: Others:

    評量工具與策略、評分標準成效Evaluation Criteria

    Class Participation                                  30%

    Midterm exam                                         30%

    Final Paper                                              30%

    Pop Quiz 4                                              10%

    指定/參考書目Textbook & References

    已申請之圖書館指定參考書目 圖書館指定參考書查詢 |相關處理要點

    維護智慧財產權,務必使用正版書籍。 Respect Copyright.

    本課程可否使用生成式AI工具Course Policies on the Use of Generative AI Tools

    有條件開放使用:Final paper grammar-syntax check only Conditional Permitted to Use

    課程相關連結Course Related Links

    
                

    課程附件Course Attachments

    課程進行中,使用智慧型手機、平板等隨身設備 To Use Smart Devices During the Class

    需經教師同意始得使用 Approval

    列印