教學大綱 Syllabus

週次

課程主題

課程內容與指定文獻

1

課程介紹

2

國家的起源與發展

1. Tilly, Charles. 1985. "War Making and State Making as organized Crime." in Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Huang, Chin-Hao, and David Kang. 2022. State Formation Through Emulation: the East Asian model.  Cambridge University Press. Ch2  (參考個案 Ch5 )  

3.  Sørensen, Georg. 2001. “War and State-Making: Why Doesn't it Work in the Third World?” Security Dialogue, 32(3): 341-354.

4. Cederman, Lars-Erik, Paola Galano Toro, Luc Girardin, and Guy Schvitz. 2023. "War Did Make States: Revisiting the Bellicist Paradigm in Early Modern Europe".  International Organization. 77:324-62. 

3

國家與認同政治

1. Muller, Jerry. 2008." Us and Them: The Enduring Power of Ethnic Nationalism" Foreign Affairs, 87(2):18-35.

2. 施正鋒.2021.  '亞爾薩斯人以及洛林人的認同 '，《文化實踐與社會變遷》 4期，頁 13-53

3. Wang, T.Y. 2017. “The Changing Boundaries” in Christopher H. Achen and T. Y. Wang eds. The Taiwan Voter. University of Michigan Press. Chapter 3

4. 鄭夙芬. 2022.. '解析台灣人/中國人認同：2000-2021年, ' 選舉研究, 29(2):.73-114

5. Yang, Dominic Meng-Hsuan and Mau-Kuei Chang. 2010. " Understanding the Nuances of Waishengren: History and Agency"  China Perspectives, 3:108-122. 

楊孟軒著 (蔡耀緯譯) 2023《逃離中國：現代臺灣的創傷、記憶與認同》

4

國家能力

(疫情政治)

1. Weiss, Linda & Elizabeth Thurbon. 2022. "Explaining divergent National Responses to Covid-19  An Enhanced State Capacity Framework " New Political Economy  27(4): 697-712

2. Gordon, Andrew and Micahel R. Reich. 2021. "The puzzle of vaccine Hesitancy in Japan" Journal of Japanese studies  47(2): 411-436.

5

世代差異

I. 不同世代的民主支持度/滿意度

1. Claassen, Christopher and Pedro C. Magalhaes. (2023). Public Support for Democracy in the United States Has Declined Generationally. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(3), 240–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad039

II. 除了民主態度，台灣的世代差異

2. 王光旭、蔡子弘. 2022 . 〈社會資本與公民意識：世代差異的比較〉，《公共行政學報》63:51102。

3. 林佩婷、鄭夙芬、王德育. 2020. 〈臺灣認同的世代差異與投票抉擇: 以2016年總統選舉為例〉，《選舉研究》，27(1)85-124。

參考:  崔曉倩、吳重禮. 2011.〈年齡與選舉參與：2008 年總統選舉的實證分析〉，《調查研究—方法與應用》，26: 7-44。

參考: 陳光輝.  2010. 〈民主經驗與民主價值—兩個世代台灣大學生之比較〉，《臺灣民主季刊》7(4): 1–45。

6

民主倒退vs. 民主韌性

I.

Diamond, Larry. 2021. "Democratic Regression in Comparative Perspective: Scope, Methods, and Causes." Democratization 28 (1): 22-42.

II.  防止民主倒退/民主韌性 (制度? 文化? 行為者?)

Kaufman, Robert R. and Stephan Haggard. 2019." Democratic Decline in the United States: What Can We Learn from Middle-Income Backsliding?" Perspective on Politics 17(2): 417-432.

Welzel, Christian .2021. “Why the Future is Democratic” Journal of Democracy 32(2):132-44.

參考 Berlucchi, Antonio Benasaglio and Marisa Kellam. 2023. "Who’s to blame for democratic backsliding: populists, presidents or dominant executives" Democratization. 30(5)815-835.

Waldner, David and Ellen Lust. 2018. 'Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backslding." Annual Review of Political Science 21:93-113.

7

民粹主義

1.  Mudde, Cas and Cristobal Kaltwasser. 2018. 'Studing Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflectiosn on Contemporary and Future Research Agenda."  Comparative Political Studies 51(13):1167-1693.

2. Rummens, Stefan. “Populism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy, 554–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

8

威權韌性

1. Foa 2018 Modernization and Authoritarianism

2. knutsen, Nygard and Wig 2017 Autocratic elections stabilizing tool or for change

3. Rethinking Authoritarian Resilience and the Coercive Apparatus

9

網路 新媒體

1. Breuer, Anita, Todd landman and Dorothea Farquhar.2015." Social Media and Protest Mobilization: evidence from the Tunisian revolution." Democratization. 22(4): 764-792.

2.  Delibert, Ron.2015. "Authoritarianism Goes Global: Cyberspace Under Siege." Journal of Democracy 26(3):64-78.

3. Tan, Netina. 2020. 'Digital Learning and Extending Electoral Authoritarianism in Singapore." Democratization 27(6): 1073-1091. 

10

憲政體制 (1)

1. Linz, Juan. 1990.  "The Perils of Presidentialism." Journal of Democracy 1(1):51-69

2. Hiroi, Taeko and Sawa Omori. 2009. “Perils of parliamentarism? Political systems and the stability of democracy revisited.” Democratization 16 (3): 485-507

(參考) 3.Ellis, Andrew and Kirsti Samuels (eds.) 2010. Making Presidentialism Work : Sharing and Learning from Global Experience  表單的頂端

表單的底部

表單的頂端

表單的底部

11

憲政體制 (2)

Thomas Sedelius a and Jonas Linde 2018 "Unravelling semi-presidentialism: democracy and government performance in four distinct regime types" Democratization, 25 (1): 136–157

吳玉山 2016  〈我國半總統制憲法的困局與抉擇〉，王業立主編，《臺灣民主之反思與前瞻》，台北：臺灣民主基金會

12

選舉制度與政黨

1. Urbinati , Nadia and Mark E. Warren. 2008. "The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory." Annual Review of Political Science 11:387-412. 

2. Horowitz, Donald. 2003 "Electoral Systems: A Primer for decision makers." Journal of Democracy 14(4): 115-127. 

3. Colomer, Joseph M. 2005. "It's Parties that Choose Electoral Systems (or Duverger's Laws Upside Down)." Political Studies 53:1-21. 

4. Hicken, Allen and Erik Kuhonta. 2011. "Shadows from the past: Party System Institutionalization in Asia." Comparative Political studies 44(5): 572-597. 

13

族群政治

1. Posner, Daniel (2004) “The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi.” American Political Science Review,98 (4): 529-545

2. Thillainathan, Ramasamy and Kee-Cheok Cheong (2016) " Malaysia's New Economic Policy, Growth and Distribution: Revisiting the Debate"  Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies. 53(1):51-68.

3.[參考]  徐雲彪  〈馬來西亞的經濟發展與 社會文化現況〉  

14

性別政治

1.Shim, Jaemin. 2022. “Substantive Representation of Women and Policy-Vote Trade-Offs: Does Supporting Women’s Issue Bills Decrease a Legislator’s Chance of Reelection?” The Journal of Legislative Studies 28(4): 533–53.

2. Bock, Jarrod, Jennifer Byrd-Craven, and Melissa Burkley. 2017. “The Role of Sexism in Voting in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Personality and Individual Differences 119: 189–93.

15

期末報告 (1)

16

期末報告 (2)