教學大綱 Syllabus

1

2/18

課程說明

課程說明、導讀分配

2

2/25

方法論視野：典範

Khun

3

3/04

八卦：典範吵架

《高級迷信》及周邊

4

3/11

真的魚與熊掌？

C. P. Snow

5

3/18

混合研究方法與辯論

專題緒論Lacatus, C., Schade, D., & Yao, Y. (Joanne). (2015). Quo vadis IR: Method, Methodology and Innovation. Millennium, 43(3), 767-778.  (12)

https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/0305829815587822

辯論開始 Barkin, J. S., & Sjoberg, L. (2015). Calculating Critique: Thinking Outside the Methods Matching Game. Millennium, 43(3), 852-871.  (20)

https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815576819

反對混合Jackson, P. T. (2015). Must International Studies Be a Science?,  Millennium, 43(3),942–965. (24)

不同意見 Bennett, A. (2015). Found in Translation: Combining Discourse Analysis with Computer Assisted Content Analysis. Millennium, 43(3), 984-997. (14)

https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/0305829815581535

6

3/25

方法論爭辯

1. Mutlu, C. E. (2015). Of Algorithms, Data and Ethics: A Response to Andrew Bennett. Millennium, 43(3), 998-1002. (5)

 https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/0305829815581536

2. Kurki, M. (2015). Stretching Situated Knowledge: From Standpoint Epistemology to Cosmology and Back Again. Millennium, 43(3), 779-797. (19)

 https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583322

3. Neumann, C. B., & Neumann, I. B. (2015). Uses of the Self: Two Ways of Thinking about Scholarly Situatedness and Method. Millennium, 43(3), 798-819.  (22)

https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815576818

4. Barkin, J. S. (2015). Translatable? On Mixed Methods and Methodology. Millennium, 43(3), 1003-1006. (4)

 https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/0305829815581534

5. Sjoberg, L. (2015). What’s Lost in Translation? Neopositivism and Critical Research Interests. Millennium, 43(3), 1007-1010.  (4)

https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/0305829815581632

6. Naumes, S. (2015). Is all ‘I’ IR? Millennium, 43(3), 820-832.  (13)

https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815576820

7

4/01

混合研究方法設計

1. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. (22)

https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/1558689806298224

(此文  argue that mixed methods research is one of the three major “research paradigms” (quantitative research, qualitative research, and mixed methods research). The authors hope this article will contribute to the ongoing dialogue about how mixed methods research is defined and conceptualized by its practitioners)

2. Schoonenboom, J. (2018). Designing Mixed Methods Research by Mixing and Merging Methodologies: A 13-Step Model. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 998-1015. (18)

https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/0002764218772674

8

4/08

期末報告第一稿

9

4/15

方法論怎麼進入研究思考中？

50. 張玉佩 (2005) 。從媒體影像觀照自己：觀展／表演典範之初探。新聞學研究，頁41-85
50. 徐桂權（2018）。〈新媒介環境中閱聽人參與典範的建構：以歐洲閱聽人轉型研究 計畫為考察對象〉，《新聞學研究》，134: 145-178。
50. 蔡琰、臧國仁（2017）。〈數位時代的「敘事傳播」：兼論新科技對傳播學術思潮 的可能影響〉，《新聞學研究》，131: 1-48。

10

4/22

實證主義

1. 李金銓 (2014). 傳播研究的典範與認同：一些個人的初步思考。傳播研究與實踐 ； 4卷1期 (2014 / 01 / 01) ， P1 – 21 (21)

繁體中文 DOI： 10.6123/JCRP.2014.001

2. Krcmar, M., Ewoldsen, D., & Koerner, A. (2016).  Chapter 4  Philosophical Underpinnings of the Communication Science Approach  &  Chapter 5  Positivism/Causality/Explanation. In  Communication Science Theory and Research: An Advanced Introduction, pp. 58-88. Routledge. (31)

 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203113943

3. Turner, Stephen & Roth, Paul. (2008). Introduction. Ghosts and the Machine: Issues of Agency, Rationality, and Scientific Methodology in Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science. In Stephen Turner and Paul Roth (eds)  The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell, 1-17. (17)

  10.1002/9780470756485.ch.

11

4/29

詮釋取向

Bevir, Mark & Blakely, Jason(2018). Interpretive Social Science: An Anti-Naturalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University, Chap 3-Chap 5, pp.44-114. (70)

12

5/06

建構取向

1 Burr, Vivien.  (1995).  Chap. 1, pp. 1-16; Chap. 5, pp. 79-94; Chap. 8, pp. 125-139. In An Introduction to Social Constructionism.  London and New York: Routledge. (46)

2 Rosenberg, A. (2016). Chapter 4 Actions, intentionality, and the mind-body problem, pp.55-71; Chapter 7 Social psychology and the construction of society, pp.121-141. In Philosophy of social science. Fifth edition. Westview Press. (36)

13

5/13

批判取向

1 Comstock, Donald E. (1994). A method for critical research. In Martin, Michael & McIntyre, Lee C. (Eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 625-640. (16)

2 Chiapello, E., & Fairclough, N. (2003). Understanding the new management ideology: a transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism. Discourse & Society, 13(2), 185–208. (24)

https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013002406

3 Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests, pp.301-317. (18)

14

5/20

校慶放假

停課

15

5/27

後現代取向

1Ritzer, G. and D. Goodman (2002). Postmodern Social Theory. Handbook of Socioloigical Theory. In J. H. Turner. New York, Plenum: 151-169. （20）

2 Polkinghorne, D. E. (1992). Postmodern epistemology of practice. In Psychology and Postmodernism. S. Kvale. London, Sage: 146-165. （20）

16

6/03

期末報告

期末報告

17

6/10

期末報告

期末報告、回應他組報告內容

18

6/17

彈性授課

報告整理、學期報告縱整