Type of Credit: Elective
Credit(s)
Number of Students
The emergence of sharing economy is seen as an economic revolution or a disruptive innovation to the capitalistic market-mediated exchange. This new economic paradigm marks the rise of crowd-based capitalism, enabled by the development of digital technologies. In about 10-years time, different models of sharing economy sweep the world and change the human lifestyle.
Despite the fact that various sharing economy activities have penetrated into our daily lives, questions and debates about the legitimacy as well as the social and cultural impact brought by this new form of economic model continue.
This course aims to provide students’ with knowledge and insight about the new economic paradigm of sharing economy, from the research perspective.
能力項目說明
Course Objectives:
This course is targeted at achieving the following objectives:
| 教學週次Course Week | 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week | 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type |
|---|---|---|
|
|
週次Week |
課程主題Topic |
課程內容與指定閱讀 |
教學活動與作業 |
學習投入時間Student workload expectation |
|
|
|
|
|
Content and Reading Assignment |
Teaching Activities and Homework |
課堂講授 In- class |
課程前後Outside- of-class Hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hours |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Introduction to Course Syllabus Background and Introduction to Sharing Economy |
|
Self Introduction and Grouping |
3 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 39(5), 715–734. |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600. |
|
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
Eckhardt, G. M. & Bardhi, F. (2015). The sharing economy isn’t about sharing at all. Harvard Business Review, 28. |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
Akbar, P, Mai, R. & Hoffmann, S. (2016). When do materialistic consumers join |
|
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
commercial sharing systems. Journal of Business Research 69(10), 4215–4224. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Aspara, J. & Wittkowski, K. (2018). Sharing- dominant logic? Quantifying the association between consumer intelligence and choice of social access modes. Journal of Consumer Research 46(2), 201-222. |
|
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
Eckhardt, G. M. & Bardhi, F. (2016). The relationship between access practices and economic systems. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 1(2), 210-225. |
|
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
Individual Meeting |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
Hamari, J., Mimmi, S. |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
& Antti, U. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology 67(9), 2047–2059. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
Mid Term Report – Research Proposal |
|
|
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
Davidson, A., Habibi, M. R. & Laroche, M. (2018). Materialism and the sharing economy: A cross- cultural study of American and Indian consumers. Journa l of Business Research 82, 364- 372. |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 14, 193–207. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti- consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485-498. |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152-176. Schwartz, S. H. & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
Skageby, J. (2015). The changing shape of sharing: Digital materiality and moral economies. Discover Society, 18. |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
16 |
Yang, S., Song, Y., Chen, S. & Xia, X. (2017). Why are customers loyal in sharing-economy services? A relational benefits perspective. Journ al of Services Marketing, 31(1), 48-62. |
|
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
17/18 |
Final Presentation/Wrap Up |
|
|
3 |
8 |
|
The final grade consists of:
1. Attendance & Participation 20%
The various in-class activities will include case discussion, class participation, and peer review. Students who are unable to attend class should please apply for a leave of absence in advance
2. Midterm Report - Research Proposal 40%
3. Final Examination - 40%
Note: Students must acknowledge all instances in which generative AI tools were used in an assignment (such as in ideation, research, analysis, editing, debugging, etc.).
Text Book
Reading Materials