Type of Credit: Elective
Credit(s)
Number of Students
請注意:此門課程將以英語授課,所有的報告與討論也將以英文進行。
Note: This course will be taught in English. All the presentations and discussions will also be in English.
This course explores the fundamental concepts and theories in the field of computer-mediated communication (CMC), emphasizing both traditional computerized systems and recent advancements such as conversational agents (chatbots), AI agents, and robots. Students will gain insights into how CMC influences communication patterns, user experiences, and societal dynamics.
The course consists of these key units:
能力項目說明
Upon completion of the course, students will
教學週次Course Week | 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week | 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type |
---|---|---|
Week |
Topic |
Content and Reading Assignment |
Teaching Activities and Homework |
1 |
Introduction and course overview |
|
IRB Training |
2 |
Theories and Methods |
Whittaker, S. (2003). Theories and methods in mediated communication: Steve Whittaker. In Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 246-289). Routledge. Carr, C. T. (2020). CMC is dead, long live CMC!: Situating computer-mediated communication scholarship beyond the digital age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 9-22. |
Lecture
Discussion
Grouping for class lead
Grouping for research projects |
3 |
Conversational Structure |
Holtgraves, T. M. (2002). Conversational Structure. In T. M. Holtgraves, Language as Social Interaction (pp. 89-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
Lecture Discussion |
4 |
Conversational Grounding |
Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APA. Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., & Fussell, S. R. (2013). Using visual information for grounding and awareness in collaborative tasks. Human–Computer Interaction, 28(1), 1-39. |
Lecture Discussion |
5 |
Non-Verbal Communication: Gaze and Gesture |
Hall, J. A., Horgan, T. G., & Murphy, N. A. (2019). Nonverbal communication. Annual review of psychology, 70(1), 271-294. Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., & Kraut, R. E. (2003, April). Effects of head-mounted and scene-oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 513-520). Kirk, D., Rodden, T., & Fraser, D. S. (2007, April). Turn it this way: grounding collaborative action with remote gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1039-1048). |
Group Activity Discussion |
6 |
Culture, Language & CMC |
He, H. A., Yamashita, N., Hautasaari, A., Cao, X., & Huang, E. M. (2017, February). Why did they do that? Exploring attribution mismatches between native and non-native speakers using videoconferencing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 297-309). Wang, H. C., Fussell, S., & Cosley, D. (2013, February). Machine translation vs. common language: Effects on idea exchange in cross-lingual groups. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 935-944). |
Group Activity Discussion |
7 |
Collaborating Across Space and Distance |
Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization science, 12(3), 346-371. Stoll, B., Reig, S., He, L., Kaplan, I., Jung, M. F., & Fussell, S. R. (2018, February). Wait, can you move the robot? Examining telepresence robot use in collaborative teams. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 14-22). |
Group Activity Discussion |
8 |
Informal Communication |
Kraut, R. E., Fish, R. S., Root, R. W., & Chalfonte, B. L. (1990, February). Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In Human reactions to technology: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (Vol. 145, p. 199). Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000, December). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 79-88). |
Group Activity Discussion |
9 |
Team Projects: Midterm Presentation |
See Evaluation Criteria for details. |
Group Activity Discussion |
10 |
Social Network |
Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C. H. (2010, February). Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 189-192). Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., & Panovich, K. (2010, April). What do people ask their social networks, and why? A survey study of status message Q&A behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1739-1748). Lee, Y. H., & Hsieh, G. (2013, April). Does slacktivism hurt activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 811-820). Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009, April). Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 945-954). |
Group Activity Discussion |
11 |
Livestreaming |
Tang, J. C., Venolia, G., & Inkpen, K. M. (2016, May). Meerkat and periscope: I stream, you stream, apps stream for live streams. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4770-4780). Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J. T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58-67. |
Group Activity Discussion |
12 |
Conversation agents, AI agents and Robots |
Mutlu, B., Yamaoka, F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009, March). Nonverbal leakage in robots: communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (pp. 69-76). Lee, Y. C., Yamashita, N., Huang, Y., & Fu, W. (2020, April). " I hear you, I feel you": encouraging deep self-disclosure through a chatbot. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-12). Hohenstein, J., & Jung, M. (2020). AI as a moral crumple zone: The effects of AI-mediated communication on attribution and trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 106190. |
Group Activity Discussion |
13 |
Team Projects: In-class Data Collection |
This class is reserved for conducting research and collecting data from peers. Each student should participate in each other’s projects as much as possible. Research plan/protocol must be approved by the professor or TA in advance. |
Group Activity |
14 |
CMC in Different Populations |
Herring, S. C. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal, 18(1), 0. Feuston, J. L., & Piper, A. M. (2019, May). Everyday experiences: small stories and mental illness on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-14). MacLeod, H., Bennett, C. L., Morris, M. R., & Cutrell, E. (2017, May). Understanding blind people's experiences with computer-generated captions of social media images. In proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 5988-5999). |
Group Activity Discussion |
15 |
CMC and Society |
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Social network analysis and mining, 3, 1277-1291. Kitchens, B., Johnson, S. L., & Gray, P. (2020). Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS quarterly, 44(4). Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European journal of communication, 32(1), 50-61. |
Group Activity Discussion |
16 |
Team Projects: Final Poster Session |
See Evaluation Criteria for details. |
Group Activity Discussion |
17 |
Flexible week—Preparing for Final Report |
See Evaluation Criteria for details. |
|
18 |
Flexible week—Submitting Final Report |
See Evaluation Criteria for details. |
|
* This syllabus is developed with reference to Professor Susan Fussell's courses at Cornell University (USA): Computer-Mediated Communication Seminar and Language and Technology.
The total score of 100 points will be the accumulation of these activities:
Note: Use of generative AI is encouraged in this course. However, students must briefly explain at the end of each assignment whether and how they used AI. Failing to do so will result in a score of 0 for that assignment.
The extra readings will be assigned in class by the class leads.
書名 Book Title | 作者 Author | 出版年 Publish Year | 出版者 Publisher | ISBN | 館藏來源* | 備註 Note |
---|