Type of Credit: Elective
Credit(s)
Number of Students
1. Introduction
Content: This course introduces the key elements of social theories and the organization of academic writing including research proposals, prospectuses, dissertations and research articles. Students will analyze the structure of arguments, construct their own arguments and write a theoretical essay, which may be the front-end of a prospectus, thesis or research paper.
Audience: An elective for NCCU IDAS doctoral students, particularly second-year and above. This course may also be of interest to MA students preparing to write a prospectus or thesis.
Prerequisites: No prerequisites. Students will be expected to read and write at a graduate level.
能力項目說明
2. Intended Learning Outcomes
This course aims to help students master the knowledge domains and academic skills related to analyzing and constructing social theories:
教學週次Course Week | 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week | 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type |
---|---|---|
Week of |
Readings for Discussion |
Activity & Lecture |
Due Sunday Before Class |
1. Sept 9 |
7 Kinds of Theory Classical Theory Contemporary Theory |
Discussion: What is theory?
Activity: Introductions
Lecture: Syllabus & Prelude to research articles |
|
Module 1: Elements of Social Theory
|
|||
2. Sept 16 |
7 Kinds of Theory Classical Theory Contemporary Theory
Two research articles – to contrast |
Discussion: “What is theory?” in these two research articles?
Activity: Introduce research interests. Situate yourself within the world of theory.
Lecture: Conceptualization (Argument on Three Levels) |
|
3. Sept 23 |
Theory article: Conceptualization, umbrella concepts
Research article |
Discussion: Conceptualization. Apply to articles we have read.
Activity: Map out argument on three levels, focusing on vertical (conceptualization)
Lecture: Inference, causality |
Due Sun Sept 22 (5 pts): Reference List & Clusters |
4. Sept 30 |
Theory article: Inference, causality
Research article |
Discussion: Inference & causality. Apply to articles we have read.
Activity: Map out argument on three levels, focusing on horizontal (inference; compare arguments & evidence in two research papers)
Lecture: Causal imagery |
|
5. Oct 7 |
Theory article: causal imagery. Abbot. Stinchcombe.
Research article: research with non-linear imagery |
Discussion: Causal imagery. Apply to articles we have read.
Activity: Map out argument on three levels. Map argument with interaction effect. Map non-linear arguments.
Lecture: Meta-theoretical frameworks, sociology of knowledge production. Applying this to your lit review |
Due Sun Oct 6: Draft 1 of Lit Review & Gap |
6. Oct 14 |
Theory article: Meta-theoretical frameworks, sociology of knowledge production
Read Draft 1 literature reviews. Map out two arguments. Clarify meta-theoretical framing.
|
Discussion: Meta-theoretical frameworks, sociology of knowledge production. Applying this to research articles
Activity: Choose a few lit reviews or prior articles. Map out two arguments on three levels. Focus on framing, meta-theoretical.
Lecture: What’s interesting? Novelty, conventionality. Apply to your own lit review & gap. |
|
7. Oct 21 |
Theory article: What’s interesting? Davis 1971. Novelty & Conventionality. Uzzi 2013.
Research article:
|
Discussion: What’s interesting? Novelty, conventionality. Apply to research articles. What’s interesting about your own literature reviews?
Activity: Rate novelty & conventionality of articles we have read and plot them on a 2-dim Cartesian coordinates.
Lecture: Structure of an argument. RQ, MA, propositions, hypotheses. Reference groups, control groups and falsifiability. |
|
Module 2: Constructing Your Own Theory
|
|||
8. Oct 28 |
Theory article:
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative science quarterly, 371-384.
Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1145-1154.
Casanave, C. P., & Li, Y. (2015). Novices’ struggles with conceptual and theoretical framing in writing dissertations and papers for publication. Publications, 3(2), 104-119.
Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative science quarterly, 40(3), 385-390.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on" What theory is not". Administrative science quarterly, 40(3), 391-397.
Research article:
|
Discussion: Structure of an argument. RQ, MA, propositions, hypotheses. Reference groups, control groups and falsifiability.
Activity: Differentiate topic, RQ, MA, propositions, hypotheses
Lecture: Considering Scope. Scope conditions. Mid-range theory. Historical theory. Universal theory. |
Due Sun Oct 27 (20 pts): Draft 2 of Lit Review & Gap |
9. Nov 4 |
Theory article: Merton 1968. Sociological Theories of the Middle Range
Research article: two articles contrasting universal, particular and middle-range theorizing |
Discussion: Considering Scope. Scope conditions. Mid-range theory. Historical theory. Universal theory.
Activity: Reframe a universal or historical theory as a middle-range theory
Lecture: Considering concepts. Re-conceputalization. How to write and organize this. |
|
10. Nov 11 |
Theory article: re-conceputalization
Research article: which demonstrate reconceputalization |
Discussion: Considering concepts. Re-conceputalization.
Activity: Re-conceputalize some concepts from prior research articles.
Lecture: Considering inferential, causal relationship. Social mechanisms and relational theories. How to write and organize this. |
Due Sun Nov 10: Draft 1 of Novel Argument |
11. Nov 18 |
Theory article: Svedberg. Social Mechanisms. Relational sociology: Emirbayer or Mische.
Research article: two articles comparing variable-centered & relational theory |
Discussion: Considering inferential, causal relationship. Social mechanisms and relational theories.
Activity: Reframe a variable-centered theory in terms of social mechanisms, in terms of relationships.
Lecture: Engaging in meta-theoretical arguments. Reframe the argument on a meta-theoretical level. |
|
12. Nov 25 |
Theory article: Engaging in meta-theoretical arguments. Reframe the argument on a meta-theoretical level.
Read two Draft 1 of Novel Argument. Critique arguments in terms of logic, scope, mechanism and meta-theoretical framework. |
Discussion: Engaging in meta-theoretical arguments. Reframe the argument on a meta-theoretical level. Discuss in relation to earlier articles.
Activity: Workshop each others Draft 1 of Novel Arguments. Critique arguments in terms of logic, scope, mechanism and meta-theoretical framework.
Lecture: Types of academic writing. Variation in organization and style. Compare styles, including popular academic writing. |
|
Module 3: Academic Writing
|
|||
13. Dec 2 |
Theory article: Types of academic writing. Variation in organization and style. Compare styles
Research article: writings on the same topic, different format, different time period. |
Discussion: Types of academic writing. Variation in organization and style. Compare styles, including popular academic writing.
Activity: Compare organization and style of academic writing over different time periods.
Lecture: Writing for an audience. Who is your audience? Framing. |
Due Sun Dec 1 (20 pts): Draft 2 of Novel Argument |
14. Dec 9 |
Theory article:
Kroll, B. M. (1984). Writing for readers: Three perspectives on audience. College composition and communication, 35(2), 172-185.
Research article |
Discussion: Writing for an audience. Who is your audience? Framing.
Activity: Who is the audience for your research? Re-work arguments and framings for different audiences.
Lecture: Rhetoric and persuasion. Rhetorical strategies. Apply to our own writing. |
|
15. Dec 16 |
No class
|
No class |
|
16. Dec 23 |
Theory article: Rhetoric and persuasion. Rhetorical strategies. Apply to our own writing
Research article |
Discussion: Rhetoric and persuasion. Rhetorical strategies. Apply to our own writing
Activity: Rework rhetorical strategies for prior articles.
Lecture: Style & writing tips |
Due Sun Dec 22: Draft 1 of Full Essay |
17. Dec 30 |
Theory article: 2-3 articles on writing style
Read each other’s full essay. Focus on introductions. Critique in terms of audience, rhetorical strategy, writing style. |
Discussion: Style & writing tips
Activity: Edit Introductions. Critique in terms of audience, rhetorical strategy, writing style.
Activity: Evaluate course. Self-refections. Next steps. |
|
18. Jan 6 |
No class |
|
Due Mon Jan 6 (30 pts): Draft 2 of Full Essay |
Deadline for Submitting Grades: Monday February 3
|
Graded Assignment |
Percent of Overall Grade |
Reading Quizzes (Best 5 of 7) |
25 |
Reference List (E) |
5 |
Draft 2 of Lit Review & Theoretical Gap (B + C + E) |
20 |
Draft 2 of Novel Argument (B + C + D + E) |
20 |
Draft 2 of Full Essay (A + B + C + D + E) |
30 |
Week 1
1. Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociological theory, 26(2), 173-199.
2. Abrutyn, S., & Lizardo, O. (Eds.). (2021). Introduction in Handbook of classical sociological theory. Springer International Publishing.
3. Abrutyn, S. (2016). Introduction in Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Course Moodle: https://moodle-course02.nccu.edu.tw/course/view.php?id=514