Type of Credit: Elective
Credit(s)
Number of Students
本課程旨在探討土地產權理論基礎，藉由經濟分析方法之運用，進行土地產權法制經濟之分析，奠立研究理論及方法基礎，以為開啟前瞻性理論研究之基石。
能力項目說明
1.具備辨析土地產權的本質的能力。
2.具備熟稔相關理論與經濟分析方法之運用。
3.具備深度閱讀與地政有關英文期刊能力。
4.具備探索、熟悉經濟分析方法與土地法制之關聯性。
5.養成自主學習的態度與策略。
6.具備團隊合作與地政專業知識與能力。
| 教學週次Course Week | 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week | 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type |
|---|---|---|
|
1 |
法律與經濟分析基礎(一) |
探討法律與經濟分析之基礎概念 |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
|||
|
|
2 |
法律與經濟分析基礎(二) |
探討法律與經濟分析之基礎概念 |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
3 |
法律與經濟分析基礎(三) |
探討法律與經濟分析之基礎概念 |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
4 |
專書研讀 |
Cooter,. (2008) Law and Economics |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
5 |
專書研讀 |
Cooter,. (2008) Law and Economics |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
6 |
專書研讀 |
Cooter,. (2008) Law and Economics |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
7 |
專書研讀 |
Cooter,. (2008) Law and Economics |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
8 |
專書研讀 |
簡資修，經濟推理與法律 |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
9 |
專書研讀 |
簡資修，經濟推理與法律 |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
10 |
專書研讀 |
簡資修，經濟推理與法律 |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
11 |
產權與土地整體開發問題 |
探討disintegration of property、產權細碎化與土地開發之關聯 |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
12 |
產權與土地整體開發問題 |
探討拿翹、堅持問題、互補性與產權僵局之關聯 |
課堂討論、指定閱讀文獻 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
13 |
專題討論 |
外文參考文獻導讀、報告 |
文獻報告課堂討論 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
14 |
專題討論 |
外文參考文獻導讀、報告 |
文獻報告課堂討論 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
|
15 |
專題討論 |
外文參考文獻導讀、報告 |
文獻報告課堂討論 |
3 |
4.5 |
||
|
16 |
專題討論 |
外文參考文獻導讀、報告 |
文獻報告課堂討論 |
3 |
4.5 |
|||
|
17 |
專題討論 |
外文參考文獻導讀、報告 |
文獻報告課堂討論 |
3 |
4.5 |
|||
|
18 |
專題討論 |
外文參考文獻導讀、報告 |
文獻報告討論 |
3 |
4.5 |
|||
一、依指定課題(期刊、論文等)事先預習
二、上課討論及作業(50%)
三、期末報告(50%)
1.Coase, R.H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost”, 3 J. Law & Econ. 1.
2.Cooter, R.D. (1982) “The Cost of Coase”, 11 J. Legal Stud. 1.
3.Merrill, T.W., Smith, H.E. (2001a)“What Happened to Property in Law and
Economics?”, 110 Yale L. J. 1.
4.Merrill, T.W., Smith, H.E. (2001b)“The Property/Contract Interface”, 110 Colum. L.Rev. 773.
5.Janczyk, J. (1977)“An Economic Analysis of the Land Title Systems for Transferring Real Property”, 6 J. Legal Stud. 213.
6.Abraham Bell & Gideon Parchomovsky(2007) Taking Compensation Private Stanford Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 871,
7.Blume, L., Rubinfeld, D. (1984)“Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis”, 72 Cal. L. Rev. 569.
8.Fischel, W., Shapiro, P. (1988)“Takings, Insurance, and Michelman: Comments on Economic Interpretations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law”, 17 J. Legal Stud. 269.
9.Fischel, W., Shapiro, P. (1989)“A Constitutional Choice Model of Compensation for Takings”, International Review of Law and Economics, 9(115-128).
10.Hermalin, B. (1995)“An Economic Analysis of Takings”, 11 J. Law, Econ & Org. 64.
11. Francesco ParisiI(2002) “Freedom of Contract and The Laws of Entropy”
12.Jenny R. Hawkins(2010) Mitigating Hold-up Through Complementarities and Refundability
13..Lawrence Blume Daniel L. Rubinfeld Perry Shapiro(1984)The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 99, Issue 1, 1 February 1984, Pages 71–92,
14.Miceli, T., Sirmans, C.F., Turnbull, G. (2001)“The Property-Contract Boundary: An Economic Analysis of Leases”, 3 Am. Law & Econ. Rev. 165.
15.Strange, W. (1995)“Information, Holdouts, and Land Assembly”, 38 Journal of Urban Economics 317.
16.Munch, P. (1976)“An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain”, 84 JPE 473.
17.Norbert Schulz, Francesco ParisiI, and Ben Depoorter. ( ) Fragmentation in Property: Towards a General Model
18.Netter, J., Hersch, P., Manson, W. (1986)“An Economic Analysis of Adverse
Possession Statutes”, 6 Int. Rev. of Law & Econ. 217.
19. Thomas J. Miceli, and Kathleen Segerson(1994) Regulatory Takings: When Should Compensation Be Paid? The Journal of Legal Studies 23, no. 2 (Jun., 1994): 749-776.
(著作)
1.Barzel, Y. (1997)Economic Analysis of Property Rights, 2nd ed., Cambridge
University Press, New York, NY.
2.Cooter, R.D., Ulen, T. (2008) Law and Economics, 5th ed., Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston, MA.
3.Fischel, W. (1985) The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to
American Land Use Controls, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore,MD.
4.Miceli, T. (1997) Economics of Law: Torts, Contracts, Property, Litigation, Oxford
University Press, New York, NY.
5.Miceli, T. (2009) The Economic Approach to Law, 2nd ed., Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
無