Type of Credit: Elective
Credit(s)
Number of Students
I. Introduction
A. Introduction of the course
B. Introduction of the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition
II. Analysis of the competition problem
III. Aspects of moot court competitions
A. Researching international law
B. Writing the memorial
C. Preparing the oral argument
IV. Analysis of relevant legal issues: Presentation and critics
V. Final: Submission of memorials and oral argument sessions
上課重點如下:
(一)傑塞普模擬法庭辯論賽實例分析
(二)模擬法庭辯論實習
(三)相關國際公法議題討論
(四)撰寫英文模擬法庭辯論書狀
能力項目說明
Equipping students with knowledge and techniques necessary for participating in international law moot court competitions.
課程目標在培養學生解決分析有關國際法實際案件之能力,瞭解國際法庭之運作,與增進英文能力,學習成效上並具備以英語處裡涉外法律事務之能力。
教學週次Course Week | 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week | 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type |
---|---|---|
週次 Week
|
課程主題 Course Theme |
課程內容與指定閱讀 Content and Reading Assignment |
教學活動與作業 Activity and Homework |
學習投入時數 Estimated time devoted to coursework per week |
|
課堂講授 Lecture Hours |
課程前後 Preparation Time |
||||
1 |
Introduction I |
N/A |
Introduction of the course |
1.0 |
4.0 |
2 |
Introduction II
|
N/A |
1. Introduction of the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition 2. Researching International Law |
1.0 |
4.0 |
3 |
Compromis Reading and Analysis |
Compromis and other references |
Analyzing the facts and identifying legal issues |
1.0 |
4.0 |
4 |
Compromis Reading and Analysis |
Compromis and other references |
Analyzing the facts and identifying legal issues |
1.0 |
4.0 |
5 |
Compromis Reading and Analysis |
Compromis and other references |
Analyzing the facts and identifying legal issues |
1.0 |
4.0 |
6 |
彈性補充教學週 | ||||
7 |
Advance Research Techniques: Finding Applicable Laws |
Compromis and other references |
Assignment 1: preliminary research paper The paper should include a summary of significant facts and the laws relevant to the issues identified in the Compromis. |
1.0 |
4.0 |
8 | Student Presentation and Discussion | Each student should present the assignment mentioned above. | |||
9 |
Mid-Term |
N/A |
Students should each prepare and present either 1) a summary of facts or 2) a set of legal arguments regarding one of the four submissions while representing the Applicant or Respondent. |
1.0 |
4.0 |
10 |
Writing the Memorial and Student Presentation I |
Compromis and other references |
1. Writing the memorial (1) Introduction to various parts of the memorial (2) Techniques necessary for writing the various parts 2. First presentation of Group 1 (submission a) (1) Each group's first presentation was done in Mandarin. (2) The presentation should be objective and cover significant facts from the Compromis and relevant laws. (3) Presenters should be prepared for questions raised by the professor and the class. |
1.0 |
4.0 |
11 |
Preparing the Oral Argument and Student Presentation I |
Compromis and other references |
1. Preparing oral presentation (1) Techniques for compelling oral argument (2) Introduction of frequently asked questions 2. First presentation of Group 2 (submission b) |
1.0 |
4.0 |
12 |
Student Presentation I |
Compromis and other references |
First presentations of Group 3 (submission c) and 4 (submission d) |
1.0 |
4.0 |
13 |
Analysis of the Corrections and Clarifications to the Compromis and the Basic Materials |
Compromis and other references |
1. Analyzing the facts and identifying legal issues 2. Citation of Authorities: the Bluebook Assignment 2: memorial draft A memorial draft should include authoritative legal arguments prepared for the designated party of the present case. |
1.0 |
4.0 |
14 |
Student Presentation II |
Compromis and other references |
Second Presentation (1) Each group's second presentation is done in English. (2) The presentation should be persuasive. (3) Presenters should be prepared for questions from the professor and the class. |
1.0 |
4.0 |
15 |
Student Presentation II |
Compromis and other references |
Second Presentation (1) Each group's second presentation is done in English. (2) The presentation should be persuasive. (3) Presenters should be prepared for questions from the professor and the class. |
1.0 |
4.0 |
16 |
Critic Sessions |
Compromis and other references |
The teaching assistant could conduct the sessions in groups using time outside of the class. The session would cover: 1. General comments on memorial drafts 2. Comments and critics regarding the previous oral presentations 3. Questions and answers regarding the final exam Assignment: revised memorial A revised memorial should address the comments and suggestions raised by the professor, the class, and the teaching assistant during the in-class presentations and the critique session. |
1.0 |
4.0 |
17 |
國定假日 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
彈性補充教學週 |
1. Class participation 50% (含出席率)
2. Written Assignments 20%
3. Oral presentations 30%
1. Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition 2023/2024 案例題目
2. Richard C. Wydick and Amy E. Sloan, PLAIN ENGLISH FOR LAWYERS 7th ed. Durham North California:California Academic Press 2024.
3. International Law Students Association Materials for Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition http://www.ilsa.org/jessup/index.php
4. CECILIE ELISABETH SCHJATVET & ZAKIR HAFEZ ILSA GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION (2003)
5. THE BLUEBOOK: A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION (Columbia Law Review Ass’n et al. eds. 18th ed. 2005)