Type of Credit: Elective
Credit(s)
Number of Students
此課程將閱讀大量自殺學相關文獻,以利利用這些文獻,對安心專線的來電謄本,撰寫研究計畫及執行。
能力項目說明
1.對於自殺學文獻的掌握與理解
2.對安心專線的瞭解,並對來電謄本的運用
3.撰寫出對安心專線來電謄本的研究計畫,以利對安心專線有實徵研究結果,且能與自殺學文獻對話,而能提供安心專線改進之處。
教學週次Course Week | 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week | 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type |
---|---|---|
第一週:課程介紹
第二-四週:自殺理論
閱讀文獻:
1.Abramson, L. M., Alloy, L. B., Hogan, M. E., Whitehouse, W. G., Gibb, B. E., Hankin, B. L., & Cornette, M. M. (2000). The hopelessness theory of suicidality. In T. Joiner & M. D. Rudd (Eds.), Suicide science: Expanding the boundaries (pp. 17–32). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers
2.Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Suicide as escape from self. Psychological review, 97(1), 90.
3.Shneidman, E. S. (1998). The suicidal mind. Oxford University Press, USA.
4.Yoshimasu, K., Kiyohara, C., & Miyashita, K. (2008). Suicidal risk factors and completed suicide: meta-analyses based on psychological autopsy studies. Environmental health and preventive medicine, 13(5), 243-256.
5.Zhang, Y., Law, C. K., & Yip, P. S. (2011). Psychological factors associated with the incidence and persistence of suicidal ideation. Journal of affective disorders, 133(3), 584-590.
6.Joiner Jr, T. E., Brown, J. S., & Wingate, L. R. (2005). The psychology and neurobiology of suicidal behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 287-31
7.Joiner Jr, T. E., Brown, J. S., & Wingate, L. R. (2005). The psychology and neurobiology of suicidal behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 287-314.
8.Goranson, A., Ritter, R. S., Waytz, A., Norton, M. I., & Gray, K. (2017). Dying Is Unexpectedly Positive. Psychological Science, 28(7), 988-999.
9.Bostwick, J. M., Pabbati, C., Geske, J. R., & McKean, A. J. (2016). Suicide attempt as a risk factor for completed suicide: even more lethal than we knew. American journal of psychiatry, 173(11), 1094-1100.
第五-九週 idea-to-action theory of suicide
1.Ordóñez-Carrasco, J. L., Sayans-Jiménez, P., & Rojas-Tejada, A. J. (2023). Ideation-to-action framework variables involved in the development of suicidal ideation: A network analysis. Current Psychology, 42(5), 4053-4064.
2.May AM, Klonsky ED. What distinguishes suicide attempters from suicide ideators? A meta-analysis of potential factors. Clin Psychol (New York). 2016;23(1):5–20.
3.Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Huang X, et al. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(2):187–232. pmid:27841450
4.Klonsky ED, May AM. The three-step theory (3ST): A new theory of suicide rooted in the “ideation-to-action” framework. Int J Cogn Ther. 2015;8(2):114–29
5.Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Cukrowicz KC, Braithwaite SR, Selby EA, Joiner TE Jr. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):575–600. pmid:20438238
6.O’Connor RC. Towards an integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behaviour. In: Platt S, O’Connor RC, Gordon J, editors. International handbook of suicide prevention: Research, policy and practice. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. p. 181–199.
7.O’Connor RC, Kirtley OJ. The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1754):20170268. pmid:30012735
8.Klonsky ED, Pachkowski MC, Shahnaz A, May AM. The three-step theory of suicide: Description, evidence, and some useful points of clarification. Prev Med. 2021;152:106549. pmid:34538372
9.Khazem LR, Anestis MD. Thinking or doing? An examination of well-established suicide correlates within the ideation-to-action framework. Psychiatry Res. 2016;245:321–6. pmid:27575650
10.Ma J, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Han J. A systematic review of the predictions of the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;46:34–45. pmid:27155061
11.Chu C, Buchman-Schmitt JM, Stanley IH, Hom MA, Tucker RP, Hagan CR, et al. The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(12):1313–45. pmid:29072480
12.Gallyer AJ, Hajcak G, Joiner TE. What is Capability for Suicide? A Review of the Current Evidence [Internet]. PsyArXiv [Preprint]. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 18].
13.May AM, Victor SE. From ideation to action: Recent advances in understanding suicide capability. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018;22:1–6. pmid:30122270
14.Bayliss LT, Lamont-Mills A, du Plessis C, Morgan T. Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e043649. pmid:33589461
15.Rogers ML, Duffy ME, Buchman-Schmitt JM, Datoc AE, Joiner TE. Exercise dependence: Associations with capability for suicide and past suicidal behavior. J Clin Psychol. 2019;75(1):165–77. pmid:30368806
16.Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Gordon KH, Bender TW, Joiner TE Jr. Suicidal desire and the capability for suicide: Tests of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior among adults. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008;76(1):72–83. pmid:18229985
17.Ribeiro JD, Witte TK, Van Orden KA, Selby EA, Gordon KH, Bender TW, et al. Fearlessness about death: The psychometric properties and construct validity of the revision to the acquired capability for suicide scale. Psychol Assess. 2014;26(1):115–26. pmid:24274043
18.Dhingra K, Klonsky ED, Tapola V. An empirical test of the three-step theory of suicide in U.K. university students. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019;49(2):478–87. pmid:29604120
19.Yang L, Liu X, Chen W, Li L. A test of the three-step theory of suicide among Chinese people: A study based on the ideation-to-action framework. Arch Suicide Res. 2019;23(4):648–61. pmid:30024342
20.Chu C, Hom MA, Stanley IH, Gai AR, Nock MK, Gutierrez PM, et al. Non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A study of the explanatory roles of the interpersonal theory variables among military service members and veterans. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018;86(1):56–68. pmid:29172592
21.Bayliss, L. T., Christensen, S., Lamont-Mills, A., & du Plessis, C. (2022). Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One, 17(10), e0276070.
第十週 許文耀(2021)安心專線的成效探討--運算取向的運用。國科會計畫。
第十一週 參觀安心專線
第十二週 修課學生初步擬定研究計畫與討論
第十三-十六週 修課學生報告研究計畫進度與討論
第十七週 修課學生完整報告研究計畫
第十八週 繳交研究計畫
期末繳交研究計畫(100%)
請參考每週進度