教學大綱 Syllabus

Basic Readings

1. Winters, M. E., & Nathan, G. S. (2020). Cognitive linguistics for linguists. Berlin: Springer.
2. Ungerer, T., & Hartmann, S. (2023). Constructionist approaches: Past, present, future. Cambridge University Press.

Metaphor & Metonymy

1. Andorno, C. (2023). Evolution is an arc along a timeline Metaphors embodied in teachers’ gesture support abstract conceptualization and academic lexicon acquisition at primary school. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 9-34.
2. Barnden, J. (2018). Broadly reflexive relationships, a special type of hyperbole, and implications for metaphor and metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 218-234.
3. Barnden, J. (2022). Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 33-69.
4. Benczes & Szabo (2022). Onomatopoeia and metonymy. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 195-209.
5. Brdar et al. (2022). Rosie the Riveter of the COVID time A case study on figurative intervisuality. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 258-289.
6. Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabo, R. (2022). Living metaphors and metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 1–6.
7. David, O., Lakoff, G., & Stickles, E. (2016). Cascades in metaphor and grammar. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 214-255.
8. Dekavalla, M. (2022). Metaphors of the virtual: how ordinary people frame what the internet is. Social Semiotics, 1-14.
9. Geeraerts, D. (2022). What does it mean to wear a mask. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 70-90.
10. Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2022). Metaphorical experience Contiguity or cross-domain mappings. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 7-32.
11. Golubeva T (2023). The proper names ’Assad’, ’ISIL’, ’ISIS’, “Daesh” and “European” as metonymic blends in political discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 115-139.
12. Jensen, T. W., & Greve, L. (2019). Ecological cognition and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 1-16.
13. Kang et al (2023). Meaning extensions of internet memes A case study of the If 2020 was a X meme. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 178–209.
14. Kos P. (2023) The role of metonymy in naming If longhair then apple tree and teacher. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 86-114.
15. Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive linguistics, 28(2), 321-347.
16. Kövecses, Z. (2020). An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 112-130.
17. Lee, Y. J. (2023). Fighting whom? A critical approach to marketing communication of skin whitening product in Taiwan. Social Semiotics, 1-22.
18. Littlemore, J. (2022). On the creative use of metonymy. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 104-129.
19. Munoz, C. P. (2022). Forty years of metonymy The time-measurement pseudo-partitive construction in English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 172-194.
20. Pannain, R., & Pace, L. D. (2022). Metonymy and the polysemy of Covid in Italian. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 231-257.
21. Panther, K. U. (2022). Attribute transfer The figurative interpretation of shifted modifiers. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 130-155.
22. Radden, G. (2022). Metonymic hitting. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 156-171.
23. Rajeg, G. P. W., & Rajeg, I. M. (2023). Exploring diachronic salience of emotion metaphors A contrastive study of happiness metaphors in Classical Malay and Indonesian. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 229–265.
24. Ritchie, L. D., & Zhao, X. (2020). To “Face the Powder” or “Powder the Face”? Contemporary Metaphor Theory and the Art of Chinese to English Translation. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(2), 122-135.
25. Soriano, C., & Valenzuela, J. (2022). The size of shame and pride Testing metonymy in the figurative representation of moral emotions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 210-230.
26. Yu, Y. (2021). Metaphorical representations of “leftover women”: between traditional patriarchy and modern egalitarianism. Social semiotics, 31(2), 248-265.
27. Zeng, H. (2019). A cognitive-pragmatic approach to metaphor and metonymy in brand names: a case study of film titles. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 17(1), 1-47.
28. 吳雙羽、 賴惠玲 (2021)。味覺詞 [甜] 的通感轉移與情緒誘發。華語文教學研究，18(3)，73-105。
29. 張榮興 (2023)。台灣華語 [金蟬脫殼] 的語意網絡分析。臺灣語文研究，18(1)，91-133。
30. 張榮興 (2017)。心理空間理論與《 莊子》 不為官寓言的隱喻分析。臺灣語文研究，12(2)，161-185。

Construction & Grammar

1. Chang, J. I. (2023). The grammaticalization of verbs of location movement into noun-phrase conjunctions in Archaic Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 24(2), 183-215.
2. Davidse, K., & Brems, L. (2022). A semiotic approach to grammaticalization: modelling representational and interpersonal modality expressed by verbonominal patterns. Language Sciences, 91, 101473.
3. Davidse, K., & Breban, T. (2019). A cognitive-functional approach to the order of adjectives in the English noun phrase. Linguistics, 57(2), 327-371.
4. Diessel, H., Dabrowska, E., & Divjak, D. (2019). Usage-based construction grammar. Cognitive linguistics, 2, 50-80.
5. Givón, Talmy. (1995). Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
6. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
7. Goldberg, A. E.  (2001). Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: The role of information structure in argument distribution. Language Sciences, 23,503-24.
8. Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(5), 219-224.
10. Goldberg, A. E.  (2010). Verbs, constructions, and semantic frames. Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, ed. by M. R. Hovav, e. Doron, and I. Sichel, 39-58. Oxford: oxford University Press.
11. Goldberg, A. E. (2016). Subtle implicit language facts emerge from the functions of constructions. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 2019.
12. Heine, B., & Kaltenböck, G. (2021). From clause to discourse marker: on the development of comment clauses. Language Sciences, 87, 101400.
13. Hunston, S., & Su, H. (2019). Patterns, constructions, and local grammar: A case study of ‘evaluation’. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 567-593.
14. Liu, M., & Cuyckens, H. (2023). The grammaticalization of impossibility: The emergence of the Mandarin modal auxiliary wufa. Language and Linguistics, 24(4), 733-763.
15. Liu, T. H., & Su, L. I. W. (2021). Chinese idioms as constructions: Frequency, semantic transparency and their processing. Language and Linguistics, 22(4), 558-592.
16. Long, H., Wang, X., & Wang, L. (2022). Formation of Modern Chinese speech-quotative nǐ shuō ‘you say’and feedback-seeking nǐ shuō ‘you tell me’ Two grammaticalizational pathways. Language and Linguistics, 23(4), 743-777.
17. Radden, Gὕnter, and René Dirven. (2008). Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Sun, J. (2023). The {bei+ verb+ jiangqu} construction in pre-twelfth century Chinese: Its evolution and transcription. Language and Linguistics, 24(4), 764-794.
19. Tai, Hao-yi. (2003). Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 4(2), 301-316.
20. Tai, James H-Y. (2005). Conceptual structure and conceptualizations in Chinese grammar. Language and Linguistics 6(4), 539-574.
21. Traugott, Elizabeth C. (2003). Constructions in grammaticalization. A Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by B. Joseph and R. Janda, 624-647. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. 郭維茹 (2021)。臺灣閩南話語氣助詞 [呢] 的來源和演變。臺灣語文研究，6(2)，69-214。
23. 郭維茹(2022)。古漢語言說動詞 [道] 的語法化和詞彙化。語言暨語言學，23(3) ， 451-491。
24. 劉美君（2015）。如何理解中文語法－從功能詞說起。華語文教學研究，12（3），31-52。
25. 蔡維天、楊謦瑜、陳映竹、陳志杰、張俊盛 (2022) 。漢語及物化的大數據研究。台灣語言學期刊，20(1) ，1-27。
26. 蘇建唐 (2020) 。臺閩語多功能詞 [算] 的語法化── 兼論 [算] 與 [V 算] 的比較。臺灣語文研究，15(1) ，1-40。
27. 魏吟玲、蕭惠貞 (2022)。漢語運動事件趨向補語構式規則之探究── 以 [V+ 來/過/過來] 為例。 台灣語言學期刊，20(2) ，141-179。
28. 吳雙羽、賴惠玲 (2022) 。從範例模型及詞彙構式互動的觀點探討新型 [被+ X] 構式。台灣語言學期刊，20(1) ， 115-150。
29. 蘇建唐 (2023)。論臺閩語「一時」與「一時仔」的對比。臺灣語文研究，18(2)，347-382。

Cognitive Linguistics & Language learning/teaching

1. Boers, Frank. (2013). Cognitive semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases: An assessment. Metaphor and Metonymy Revisited beyond the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor, ed. by F. Gonzálvez-García, M. S. P. Cervel, and L. P. Hernández, 229-264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Chiu, Hsin-fu. (2017). Sequence Organizations as Scaffolds for Learning Chinese as a Second/Foreign Language. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 14(3), 31-70.
3. Holme, R. (2010). A construction grammar for the classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(4), 355-377.
4. Jeon, J & Sung, M. (2023). L2 English learners’ verb lexicalization of motion events Effects of proficiency and salience of manner. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 266-292.
5. Kim, H., & Rah, Y. (2021). Applying constructionist approaches to teaching English argument structure constructions to EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 55(2), 568-592.
6. Littlemore, J. (2023). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Springer Nature.
7. Suñer, et al. (2023). Bodily engagement in the learning and teaching of grammar On the effects of different embodied practices on the acquisition of German modal verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 35–63.
8. 戴浩一(2003) 。認知功能語法與漢語教學。語言理論與語言教學，34-45。香港：香港教育學院。

Others

1. Hsin, A. L. C. (2016). An analysis of Chinese tag questions with a cross-linguistic comparison to English tags. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 14(1), 69-119.
2. Hsiao, S. H. C. (2015). The role of force in Mandarin verbs of cutting. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 1-30.
3. Hsiao, H. S., Chen, Y. C., & Wu, Y. C. (2016). Representation of polysemy in mandarin verbs: chī, dǎ, and xǐ. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 42(1), 1-30.
4. Hsu, H. M., Wang, Y. F., & Hu, K. M. (2015). Direct and indirect conditionals: a corpus-based study of Chinese yaoshi and yaobushi in spoken and written discourse. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 31-77.
5. Huang, R. H. R. (2017). On the grammatical category of postnominal keshi in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 15(1), 103-139.
6. Huang, C. R., & Shi, D. X. (Eds.). (2016). A reference grammar of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Huang, Chu-ren and Kathleen Ahrens. (2003). Individuals kinds and events: Classifier coercion of nouns. Language Sciences 25, 353-373.
8. Jin, D., & Chen, J. (2019). Scalarity, degree reading and maximality in a Mandarin numeral construction. Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 148-179.
9. Liu, M., & Chang, J. (2019). From caused-motion to spatial configuration. Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 180-224.
10. Liu, M., & Hu, C. Y. (2013). Free alternation? A study on grammatical packaging of excessive predication in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 14(1), 47-90.
11. Lin, J., & Peck, J. (2016). Classification of Mandarin Chinese Simple Adjectives: A Scale-Based Analysis of Their Quantitative Denotations. Language and Linguistics, 17(6), 827-855.
12. Packard, J. (2016). Lexical word formation. In C. R. Huang & D. X. Shi (Eds.), A reference grammar of Chinese (pp. 67-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Shyu, S. I., Wang, Y. F., & Lin, Z. J. (2013). An Approximation to Secondary Predication Structure: A Case of V-qilai in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 14(4), 701-736.
14. Thompson, S. and P. Hopper. (2001). Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 27-60. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
15. Wang, H. (2005). A construction-based approach to Chinese lexical semantics. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 10(4), 495-508.
16. Wang, W. (2015). The Semantic Map of the Spatial Domain and Related Functions. Language and Linguistics, 16(3), 465-500.
17. Wang, S., Huang, C. R., Yao, Y., & Chan, A. (2019). The effect of morphological structure on semantic transparency ratings. Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 225-255.
18. Wang, C. A. A., & Wu, H. H. I. (2018). The syntax and semantics of Chinese impersonal v-qilai construction. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 16(1), 1-34.
19. Xie, Z., & Luo, Q. (2019). Degree intensifiers as expressives in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 256-281.
20. Xu, Yi. (2014). A corpus-based functional study of shi…de constructions. Chinese Language and Discourse 5(2),146-184.
21. Yan, H. B., & Webster, J. (2015). An integrated approach to functional corpus construction. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 13(1), 53-77.
22. 謝富惠 (2022)。台灣南島語 [說] 動詞語義現象初探。臺灣語文研究，17(1) ，47-92。
23. 連金發（2015）。人稱代詞稱謂語的活用──說曹操曹操就到。華語文教學研究，12（2），31-50。
24. 連金發（2000）。構詞學問題探索。漢學研究，18（2），61-78。
25. 連金發（2009）。華語中構式和詞彙屬性的互動。暨南大學華文學院學報(華文教學與研究)，33（1），46-76。
26. 歐德芬 (2015)。教學為導向的漢語多義動詞辨析─以「開」為例。臺灣華語教學研究，11，45-66。
27. 蔡美智（2011）。過程方便，結果便利─狀態動詞事件結構與近義詞教學。華語文教學研究，8（3），1-22。
28. 戴浩一(2007)。中文構詞與句法的概念結構。華語文教學研究，4 (1)， 1-30。
29. 戴浩一（2015）。漢語「在」處所片語詞序在日文與韓文的對應。台灣華語教學研究，11，1-8。
30. 屈承熹（2017）。形各異而實相通──現代漢語句末情態虛詞與英語語調。華語文教學研究，14（2），41-64。
31. 宋作豔（2014）。漢英事件強迫之比較研究。語言暨語言學，15（2），199-229．
32. 尚國文（2010）。現代漢語「有」比較句的句法、語意特徵考察。華語文教學研究，7（2），1-24。
33. 尚國文（2010）。度量否定的認知語用闡釋。語言暨語言學，11（4），735-766。
34. 王錦慧（2015）。時間副詞「在」與「正在」的形成探究。語言暨語言學，16（2），187-212。
35. 吳品嬅、陳純音（2015）。華語時間表述方位詞「前」、「後」、「上」、「下」之習得：三位美加學生的個案研究。華語文教學研究，12（1），45-82。
36. 汪昌松（2014）。從被動句看「這本書的出版」。語言暨語言學，15（2），231-264．
37. 汪維輝、秋谷裕幸（2014）。漢語「聞／嗅」義詞的現狀與歷史。語言暨語言學，15（5），699-732。
38. 烏雲賽娜、潘海華（2014）。漢語被字句與回指中心過渡關係的研究。語言暨語言學，15（2），265-293。
39. 魏培泉（2013）。「V–過–來/去」的歷史發展。中國語言學集刊，7（2），1-34。
40. 魏培泉（2016）。經驗體標記「過」的歷史由來。語言暨語言學，17（2），265-290。