Type of Credit: Required
Credit(s)
Number of Students
本課程主要是按照議題探討不同政治制度的形成與變遷,以及制度對於行為者的影響
能力項目說明
本課程是希望透過不同制度比較與個案研究,讓同學對制度理論與相關研究有基本的瞭解,並發展未來研究的可能分析架構。
教學週次Course Week | 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week | 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type |
---|---|---|
週次 |
課程主題 |
課程內容與指定文獻 |
教學活動與作業 |
1 |
課程介紹 |
|
講述 |
2. |
二二八和平紀念日放假 |
|
|
3 |
憲政體制 (1) |
1. Linz, Juan. 1990. "The Perils of Presidentialism." Journal of Democracy 1(1):51-69 2. Gerring, John, and Carola Moreno. 2009. "Are Parliamentary Systems Better?" Comparative Political Studies 42(3): 327-359. 3. Chiebub, José Antonio, and Fernando Limongi. 2002. "Democratic Institutions and Regime Survival: Parliamentary and Presidential Democracies Reconsidered." Annual Review of Political Science 5:151-179.
|
講述與討論 |
4 |
憲政體制 (2) |
1. Elgie, Robert. 2011. " Semi-Presidentialism: An Increasingly Common Constitutional Choice" in Robert Elgie, Sophia Moestrup and Yu-Shan Wu eds. Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. New York : Palgrave Macmillan. pp.1-20. 2. Schleiter, Petra and Edward Morgan-Jones. 2010." Who's in Charge? Presidents, Assemblies, and the Political Control of semipresidential Cabinets" Comparative Political Studies 43(11):1415-1441. 3. 吳玉山 2016 〈我國半總統制憲法的困局與抉擇〉,王業立主編,《臺灣民主之反思與前瞻》,台北:臺灣民主基金會
|
講述與討論 |
5 |
選舉制度與政黨 |
1. Urbinati , Nadia and Mark E. Warren. 2008. "The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory." Annual Review of Political Science 11:387-412. 2. Horowitz, Donald. 2003 "Electoral Systems: A Primer for decision makers." Journal of Democracy 14(4): 115-127. 3. Colomer, Joseph M. 2005. "It's Parties that Choose Electoral Systems (or Duverger's Laws Upside Down)." Political Studies 53:1-21. 4. Hicken, Allen and Erik Kuhonta. 2011. "Shadows from the past: Party System Institutionalization in Asia." Comparative Political studies 44(5): 572-597.
|
講述與討論 |
6 |
威權韌性 |
1.Diamond, Larry. 2002." Thinking about Hybrid Regimes." Journal of Democracy 13(2):21-35. 2. Knutsen, Carl Henrik, HÅvard Mokleiv Nyg Ård, and Tore Wig. 2017. "Autocratic Elections : Stabilizing Tool or Force For Change?" World Politcs 69(1): 98-143. 3. Foa, roberto Stefan.2018. "Modernization and Authoritarianism." Journal of Democracy 29(3): 129-140. |
講述與討論 |
7 |
放假 |
|
|
8 |
民主倒退
|
1. Waldner, David and Ellen Lust. 2018. 'Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backslding." Annual Review of Political Science 21:93-113. 2. Mudde, Cas and Cristobal Kaltwasser. 2018. 'Studing Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflectiosn on Contemporary and Future Research Agenda." Comparative Political Studies 51(13):1167-1693. 3. Kaufman, Robert R. and Stephan Haggard. 2019." Democratic Decline in the United States: What Can We Learn from Middle-Income Backsliding?" Perspective on Politics 17(2): 417-432.
|
講述與討論 |
9 |
網路 新媒體 |
1. Breuer, Anita, Todd landman and Dorothea Farquhar.2015." Social Media and Protest Mobilization: evidence from the Tunisian revolution." Democratization. 22(4): 764-792. 2. Delibert, Ron.2015. "Authoritarianism Goes Global: Cyberspace Under Siege." Journal of Democracy 26(3):64-78. 3. Tan, Netina. 2020. 'Digital Learning and Extending Electoral Authoritarianism in Singapore." Democratization 27(6): 1073-1091. |
講述與討論 |
10 |
國家與認同政治 |
1. Tilly, Charles. 1985. "War Making and State Making as organized Crime." in Peper Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2. Muller, Jerry. 2008." Us and Them: The Enduring Power of Ethnic Nationalism" Foreign Affairs, 87(2):18-35. 3. Wang, T.Y. 2017. “The Changing Boundaries” in Christopher H. Achen and T. Y. Wang eds. The Taiwan Voter. University of Michigan Press. Chapter 3
|
講述與討論 |
11 |
族群政治 |
1. Posner, Daniel (2004) “The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi.” American Political Science Review,98 (4): 529-545 2. Thillainathan, Ramasamy and Kee-Cheok Cheong (2016) " Malaysia's New Economic Policy, Growth and Distribution: Revisiting the Debate" Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies. 53(1):51-68. 3.[參考] 徐雲彪 〈馬來西亞的經濟發展與 社會文化現況〉
|
講述與討論 |
12 |
抗爭政治與集體行動 |
1. Tarrow, Sidney and Charles Tilly. 2007. "Contentious Politics and Social Movements" in Carles Boix and Susan Stokes, eds. Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. ch19. **參考 Tarrow, Sidney, Charles Tilly and Douglas McAdam. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York and London: Cambridge University Press. 2. Breuer, Anita, Todd landman and Dorothea Farquhar.2015." Social Media and Protest Mobilization:evidence from the Tunisian revolution." Democratization. 22(4): 764-792. 3. 林澤民、蘇彥斌 . 2015. 台灣快閃政治 台灣民主季刊 12(2):123-159. Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Ch1. |
講述與討論 |
13 |
政治經濟(1) |
Ross, Michael. 2015. "What have we learned abut resource curse?" Annual Review of Political Science 18:239-259 Sachs, Jerey D. (2001). “Tropical Underdevelopment." NBER Working Paper Series, 8119. Haggard, Stephan. 2015. "The Developmental State is dead: Long Live the Developmental State!" in James Mahoney and kathleen Thelen (eds), Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis. Chapter 2 pp.39-56. Ornston, Darius and Mark Vail. 2016. "The Development State in Developed Societies: Power, Partnership, and Divergent Patterns of Intervention in France and Finland." Comparative Politics 49(1):1-21
|
講述與討論 |
14 |
政治經濟(2)
|
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. ( 至少Introduction 與 Part I) Person, Paul. 1996." The New Politics of the welfare States. " World Politics 48(2):143-179 McMenamin, Iain. 2012. "If Money Talks, What does it say? Varieties of Capitalism and Business Financing of Parties." World Politics. 64(1):1-38 |
講述與討論 |
15 |
疫情政治 |
Tiberghien, Yves.2021. The East Asian Covid-19 Paradox (Elements in Politics and Society in East Asia). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
講述與討論 |
16 |
期末報告(1) |
|
討論 |
17 |
期末報告(2) |
|
討論 |
18 |
自主學習 |
|
|
1. 每週回應作業 (response paper) (40%)
請在每週二中午12點前上傳1頁左右的回應作業 (**不是摘要)
為了與導讀同學的工作有所區別,請從文獻中精讀一篇文章,分別回答以下五個問題
1) 文章的主要論點或是要回答什麼問題
2) 作者採用什麼研究方法、研究途徑或是引用什麼資料去支持他的論證
3) 閱讀文章後所得到的收穫。 例如: 得到什麼啟發? 或是學到什麼過去所不知道或是沒有留意的部分? 或是主要貢獻
4) 該篇文章與其他文獻的主要異同
5) 對文章的批評或提問。 例如 可以評論研究方法、論證邏輯、因果關係(包括 比較同意其他文獻的論證方式或是資料的原因);也可以與自己比較熟悉的個案或是台灣的情況做比較
2. 期末報告+提問 (25%)
3. 課堂導讀報告 (25%)
4. 課堂參與 (10%) 整學期出席狀況會在期末評量時列入考慮
Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cox and McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Hall, Peter A. and Rosemary Taylor, 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44, 936-957.
Thelen (1999) “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual review of Political Science 2: 369-404.
Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen. 2010 Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck and Thelen 2005 Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies
Kam, Christopher (2009) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Haggard and Kaufman (2016) “Democratization During the Third Wave”, Annual Review of Political Science, 19: 125-144
Cheibub, Elkins and Ginsburg (2014) “Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism”, British Journal of Political Science: 1 – 30
Andersen (1990) “The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism”, Cambridge: Polity Press
Jonathan Rodden (2005) Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism
無