教學大綱 Syllabus

科目名稱:華語語法:習得與實驗設計

Course Name: Chinese grammar: acquisition and experimental design

修別:選

Type of Credit: Elective

3.0

學分數

Credit(s)

12

預收人數

Number of Students

課程資料Course Details

課程簡介Course Description

本課程介紹華語語法習得及實驗設計,以二語習得的行為實驗為主。

核心能力分析圖 Core Competence Analysis Chart

能力項目說明


    課程目標與學習成效Course Objectives & Learning Outcomes

    課程目標:了解第二語言習得的語法實驗設計,並知道如何應用到華語為第二語言習得研究 

    學習成效:   

    1.  了解第二語言習得中的語法實驗設計概念,例如condition/typetoken set list

    2.  具備深度閱讀和批判評述的能力閱讀文獻、評論並帶領課堂討論 

    3.  組織與⼝語書⾯溝通能力:⼝頭報告及書⾯報告

    每周課程進度與作業要求 Course Schedule & Requirements

    教學週次Course Week 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type

    此課綱為暫定,之後視情況有異動之可能性。 

    週次

    Week

    課程主題

    Topic

    課程內容與指定閱讀

    Content and Reading Assignment

    教學活動與作業

    Teaching Activities and Homework

    學習投入時間

    Student workload expectation

    課堂講授

    In-class Hours

    課程前後

    Outside-of-class Hours

    1

    導論Overview

    基本實驗設計和IRB概念、常見的語言背景問卷調查

    認識課程目標、了解各週進度和課程要求;預習Ionin & Zyzik (2014, p. 37- 50)

    2-3

    3-6

    2

    語法判斷測驗 Grammaticality judgment tasks

    Ionin & Zyzik (2014, p. 37-50)、基本概念例dependent vs. independent variables、condition/type和token set

    預習Ionin (2012, p. 39-43)、Liu (2012, p. 153-165倒數第二段)

    3

    3-6

    3

    接受度判斷測驗Acceptability judgment tasks

    block和 (presentation) list 的概念、Ionin (2012, p. 39-43)、Liu (2012)、討論李克特量表 (Likert scale)應使用幾個等級、其優缺點、是否該包含「我不知道」的選項等

    預習Chen & Liu (2020)、Tong & Shirai (2016) 、同儕所選之AJT文章、決定口頭報告之日期

    3

    3-6

    4

    其他判斷測驗Other judgement tasks,包含強迫選擇任務 (forced-choice task)

    學生口頭報告AJT文章、Chen & Liu (2020)、Chen, Xu, & Xie (2020)、Tong & Shirai (2016)、討論以上測驗在華語習得的適用性

    預習Eisenbeiss (2010)、查芸芸、吳思娜(2014)、

    3

    3-6

    5

    產出實驗1 Production 1

    Eisenbeiss (2010)、查芸芸、吳思娜(2014)

    預習Hansen & Chen (2001)華語習得部分、吳芙芸、盛亞南 (2014) (2023)和同儕所選之產出實驗文章

    3

    3-6

    6

    產出實驗2 Production 2

    學生口頭報告產出實驗文章Hansen & Chen (2001)華語習得部分、吳芙芸、盛亞南 (2014)、期中報告要求

    預習Ionin (2012, p. 44-46); Ionin & Zyzik (2014, p. 50-53); Schmitt & Miller (2010, p. 35-43)、Chen & Ionin (2023)

    3

    3-6

    7

    兒童節及民族掃墓節 2024/4/4

     

    0

    3-6

    8

    理解測驗:真假值判斷測驗 (Truth Value Judgement Tasks)

    學生口頭報告產出實驗文章、Ionin (2012, p. 44-46); Ionin & Zyzik (2014, p. 50-53); Schmitt & Miller (2010, p. 35-43)、Chen & Ionin (2023)

    準備期中口頭和書面報告

    3

    3-6

    9

    期中口頭報告 & 繳交期中書面報告

    期中口頭報告

    預習Ionin (2012, p. 44-46); Schmitt & Miller (2010, p. 43-46); Tsoi et al. (2019)和同儕所選之真假值測驗文章

    3

    3-6

    10

    理解測驗:圖片選擇或配對測驗 sentence-picture selection or  matching task

    學生口頭報告真假值測驗文章、Ionin (2012, p. 44-46); Schmitt & Miller (2010, p. 43-46)、Tsoi et al. (2019)、期中報告教師回饋

    預習Xu (2013)、同儕所選之句子完成或組合測驗文章、設計實驗材料

    3

    3-6

    11

    句子完成或組合測驗Sentence completion or combination task、其他理解任務

    學生口頭報告圖片選擇或配對測驗文章Xu (2013)、Slabakova (2015)

    預習蘇丹潔(2010)、設計實驗材料下次上課討論

    3

    3-6

    12

    課堂和介入研究Classroom and intervention research

    學生口頭報告句子完成或組合測驗文章蘇丹潔(2010)、學生準備實驗材料與同儕、教師討論

    預習同儕所選之課室研究文章、確定實驗材料

    3

    3-6

    13

    資料整理和描述性統計Data entry, organization, and Descriptive statistics

    學生口頭報告課室研究文章、描述性統計、課堂示範資料處理

    開始蒐集實驗資料

    3

    3-6

    14

    推論性統計Inferential statistics

    Larson‐Hall (2012)、Cunnings (2012)、Linck & Cunnings (2015)、推論性統計、期末報告要求

     

    持續蒐集實驗資料

    、預習賴瑶鍈(2020)

     

    3

    3-6

    15

    心理語言學研究方法Psycholinguistic methods

    賴瑶鍈(2020)、華語二語處理

    分析所蒐集到的資料、準備期末口頭報告

    3

    3-6

    16

    期末口頭報告

    期末口頭報告

     

    準備期末書面報告

    3

    3-6

    17

    準備期末書面報告

    0

    3-6

    18

    繳交書面報告

    0

    3-6

    授課方式Teaching Approach

    60%

    講述 Lecture

    30%

    討論 Discussion

    10%

    小組活動 Group activity

    0%

    數位學習 E-learning

    0%

    其他: Others:

    評量工具與策略、評分標準成效Evaluation Criteria

    1.  課堂出席與討論參與 20% 

    2.  期刊導讀頭報告 15%   

    第四週開始,某些週次的第一堂課為學生口頭報告(主題需與上一週的主題相關,學生可從參考書目中選擇前方打星號者,或者自行選擇報告文獻,但該篇文獻需採用上週介紹之實驗方法,且須經教師同意)。最晚須於一週前決定口頭報告之文獻,以便同學閱讀相關文獻。 

    3.  期中口頭報告10% 

    請設計一個語法實驗,為提案(proposal)性質,包括欲研究的語言現象、實驗設計(請至少提供部分材料)、欲招募的受試者人數(本堂課僅要求五名受試者)。目的是在此階段得到老師、同儕的回饋。

    4.  期中書面報告10 %

    期中口頭報告的書面版本,以學術寫作中的APA格式書寫(不須做封面),並請統整於口頭報告時得到的回饋。約3頁(12字,1.5行距,頁數規定不含參考文獻及附錄)。 除非有特殊理由,逾期不收

    5.  期末口頭報告15%

    報告實驗初步數據(pilot data),五名受試者即可。

    6.  期末書面報告30%  

    期末口頭報告的書面版本,以學術寫作中的APA格式書寫(不須做封面),含摘要、研究問題、文獻探討、研究方法、初步結果(以圖表呈現,有描述性統計例如平即可,不須有推論性統計)、討論與結論等,並統整於口頭報告時得到的回饋。約8-12頁(12字,1.5行距,頁數規定不含參考文獻及附錄)除非有特殊理由,逾期不收

    指定/參考書目Textbook & References

    前方無記號者為指定閱讀(圖書館電子書、電子期刊或由教師提供)

    * 學生可選擇前方打星號者於下一週進行口頭報告

    # 為補充教材

     

     

    W2:語法判斷測驗Grammaticality judgment task (GJT):

    Ionin, T., & Zyzik, E. (2014). Judgment and interpretation tasks in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics34, 37-64. (p. 37- 50的部分)

    # Hu, X., & Liu, C. (2007). Restrictive relative clauses in English and Korean learners' second language Chinese. Second Language Research, 23(3), 263-287.

    # Kong, S. (2012). Adult English speakers’ acquisition of Chinese count-mass classifiers (成人英語使用者對中文可數和不可數的單位用詞之習得). Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 40(2), 442-477. [a grammaticality judgment task and a multiple-choice comprehension test]

    # Su, J. (2019). Reassembly of plural and human features in the L2 acquisition of Chinese by adult Korean speakers. Second Language Research35(4), 529-555.

     

    W3:接受度判斷測驗Acceptability judgment task (AJT): 

    Ionin, T. (2012). Formal theory-based methodologies. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 30-52). (p. 39-43的部分)

    Liu, F. H. (2012). L2 acquisition of the progressive marker zai in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 1(2),153-192. [an acceptability judgment task and a picture description task]

    * Cheng, Y. W. V. & Chen, C.-Y. Doris (2017). Japanese learners' comprehension of clefts and pseudo-clefts in L2 Chinese. 華語文教學研究14(4), 1-34. [a grammaticality judgment task, an acceptability judgment task, and a multiple-choice question task]

    * 蕭惠貞、陳品蓉(2016)。日籍學習者對於漢語趨向事件表述之認知。 華語文教學研究, 13(1),35-68。

    # Prawatmuang, W., & Yuan, B. (2020). Roles of positive and indirect negative evidence in L2 feature reassembly: An empirical study of L2 acquisition of Chinese and Thai collective markers. Journal of Second Language Studies3(2), 205-232.

     

    W4:其他判斷測驗,包含強迫選擇任務(forced-choice task)

    Chen, C., & Liu, F. H. (2020). L2 acquisition of the bei passive in Mandarin Chinese: A constructionist approach. Chinese as a Second Language Research9(2), 169-198. [a sentence choice task]

    Tong, X., & Shirai, Y. (2016). L2 acquisition of Mandarin zai and -leChinese as a Second Language Research5(1), 1-25.

    # Chen, Z., Xu, Y., & Xie, Z. (2020). Assessing introspective linguistic judgments quantitatively: The case of The Syntax of Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 29(3), 311-336. [an acceptability judgment task and a forced-choice task]

     

    W5: 產出實驗1

    Eisenbeiss, S. (2010). Production methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 11-34).

    吳芙芸、盛亞南(2014。指量詞的前置優勢及賓語關係從句的產出優勢: 漢語二語學習者視角。外語教學與研究: 外國語文雙月刊,46(3),401-411。

    查芸芸、吳思娜(2014)。漢語句法啟動效應實驗研究。語言教學與研究1,13-19。

    * Hsu, D. B., & Lin, Y. Y. (2014). Development of the abstraction of second language learners’ syntactic representation: Evidence from structural priming in different levels of proficiency. 華語文教學研究11(3), 1-32.

     

    W6: 產出實驗2

    Hansen, L., & Chen, Y. L. (2001). What counts in the acquisition and attrition of numeral classifiers. JALT Journal23(1), 83-100. (可跳過日文的部分)

    # Tanaka, N., & Cherici, A. (2023). Subject advantage in L1-English learners’ production of Chinese relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 52(2), 405–424.   

    * 劉德馨、黃斐瑄2015。母語為法語、英語之華語學習者的限定成分習得。華語文教學研究12(1)83-117

    * Huang, Y. V., & Chen, C.-Y. D. (2009). Chinese children's acquisition of classifiers revisited. 華語文教學研究6(1), 1-38. [a Picture Identification Task and a Picture Description Task] (華語第一語言習得)

     

    W8: 真假值測驗 (Truth Value Judgement TasksTVJT):

    Ionin, T. (2012). Formal theory-based methodologies. Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide, 30-52. (p. 44-46的部分)

    Ionin, T., & Zyzik, E. (2014). Judgment and interpretation tasks in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics34, 37-64. (p. 50-53的部分)

    Schmitt, C., & Miller, K. (2010). Using comprehension methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 35-56). (p. 35-43的部分)

    Chen, C.-Y., & Ionin, T. (2023). Interpretation of Mandarin pronouns and reflexives by L1-Korean and L1-English learners of Mandarin. Second Language Research39(4), 941-968.

    * Su, Y.-C. (2017) Logophoric ziji in Mandarin child language. In M. Nakayama & Y.-C. Su & A. Huang (Eds.), Studies in Chinese and Japanese Language Acquisition: In Honor of Stephen Crain (pp. 65-83). John Benjamins Publishing Co. (華語第一語言習得)

    * Chen, J. (2017). When transparency doesn't mean ease: learning the meaning of resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language44(3), 695-718. [an elicitation experiment, but a kind of TVJT]

     

    W10:理解測驗:圖片選擇或配對測驗 sentence-picture selection or matching task

    Ionin, T. (2012). Formal theory-based methodologies. Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide, 30-52. (p. 44-46的部分)

    Schmitt, C., & Miller, K. (2010). Using comprehension methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 35-56). (p. 43-46的部分)

    Tsoi, E. Y. L., Yang, W., Chan, A., & Kidd, E. (2019). Mandarin–English speaking bilingual and Mandarin speaking monolingual children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Applied Psycholinguistics40(4), 933-964. (雙語習得、一語習得)

    * Fang, S., & Xu, Y. (2022). Processing and acquisition of temporality in L2 Mandarin Chinese: Effects of grammatical and lexical aspects. Frontiers in Psychology, 5137. [an online sentence-picture matching task and an offline translation task]

     

    W11-1:句子完成或組合測驗Sentence completion or combination task

    Xu, Y. (2013). CFL learners' productions of relative clauses with demonstratives: From theory to empirical research. Chinese as a Second Language Research2(2), 169-192. [a written sentence completion task]

    *Mai, Z., & Deng, X. (2019). Selective vulnerability and dominant language transfer in the acquisition of the Chinese cleft construction by heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism9(2), 202-227. [a sentence completion task, a multiple choice questions task, an acceptability judgement task, and a discourse felicity ranking task]

    *Xu, Y. (2014). Evidence of the Accessibility Hierarchy in relative clauses in Chinese as a second language. Language and Linguistics15(3), 435-464. [a written sentence combination task]

    W11-2:其他理解任務

    # Slabakova, R. (2015). Acquiring temporal meanings without tense morphology: The case of L2 Mandarin Chinese. The Modern Language Journal99(2), 283-307. [a Temporal Interpretation Choice task, a Stories task, and a Translation task]

     

    W12:課堂和介入研究

    蘇丹潔2010)。試析“構式-語塊”教學法—以存現句教學實驗為例。漢語學習(2)83-90

    * Li, Y., & Yan, L. (2017). Effects of providing explicit negative evidence on students’ perception of ungrammatical sentences using –leChinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究美國中文教師學會學報)52(3), 232-254.

    * Kuo, J. Y. C., Wu, J. S., & Chung, S. C. (2011). Computer assisted learning of Chinese shape classifiers. 華語文教學研究8(2), 99-122.

     

    W14:推論性統計

    # Larson‐Hall, J. (2012). How to run statistical analyses. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 245-274).

    # Cunnings, I. (2012). An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers. Second Language Research28(3), 369-382.

    # Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed‐effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 185-207.

     

    W15: 心理語言學研究方法

    賴瑶鍈(2020)。語言處理與語言學習-心理/神經語言學觀點。華文世界(126)73-84

    # Jegerski, J. (2014). Self-paced reading. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 20-49). New York: Routledge.

    # Yao, Q., & Renaud, C. (2016). Processing Chinese relative clauses: An investigation of second-language learners from different learning contexts. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5(2), 155-186.

    已申請之圖書館指定參考書目 圖書館指定參考書查詢 |相關處理要點

    書名 Book Title 作者 Author 出版年 Publish Year 出版者 Publisher ISBN 館藏來源* 備註 Note

    維護智慧財產權,務必使用正版書籍。 Respect Copyright.

    課程相關連結Course Related Links

    
                

    課程附件Course Attachments

    課程進行中,使用智慧型手機、平板等隨身設備 To Use Smart Devices During the Class

    需經教師同意始得使用 Approval

    列印