教學大綱 Syllabus

科目名稱:國際教育資料庫分析研究

Course Name: Seminar on secondary analysis of data from international education databases

修別:選

Type of Credit: Elective

3.0

學分數

Credit(s)

20

預收人數

Number of Students

課程資料Course Details

課程簡介Course Description

Course introduction and learner characteristics:

         

1. The course aims to cultivate students ability to analyze data from international large-scale databases, especially for educational practices.

         

2. This course is for students interested in the contents, searching for excellence, and accepting the teaching methods, including accepting that its official language is English.

         

3. The course is suitable for master or Ph.D. students with basic ability in advanced and multivariate statistics and software use for education.

         

4. Students need to bring their own laptop computers to class for hands-on activities. Major learning management systems are Facebook and Google Drive.

         

Note: This course will adjust its teaching methods based on students willingness and readiness for advanced data analysis skills. For example, R and Python will be used if students are prepared to write code for data analysis. If not, the teaching methods will change accordingly, including only reading papers and using software packages that do not need to write code (e.g. PSPP), which though cannot conduct advanced analyses.

         

核心能力分析圖 Core Competence Analysis Chart

能力項目說明


    課程目標與學習成效Course Objectives & Learning Outcomes

            assessment  
    Course objectives and Learning outcomes essay presentation/comment interaction

    1. Understand methods to access databases.

        * * *

    2. Understand papers based on secondary analysis.

          * *

    3. Understand methods to analyze data.

        * * *

    4. Analyze data from databases.

        *    

    5. Write a proposal or paper using secondary analysis.

        *    

    每周課程進度與作業要求 Course Schedule & Requirements

    教學週次Course Week 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type

    Tentative course calendar/schedule:

        In class Before class After class  

    assessment (score)

      Time investment (hour)
    Week Date Contents (papers, databases, and data analysis software packages, e.g. R, Python, and PSPP)       essay wrritten paper brief/feedback class Q&A; share in class outside class
    1 220 Introduction syllabus,Q&A,self-introduction   explore     3 3 4.5
    2 227 data bases lecture,hands-on,discussion (your essay) explore explore, essay     3 3 4.5
    3 305 finding papers and references same above same above same above     3    
    4 312 data analysis skills and packages same above same above same above     3 3 4.5
    5 319 (彈性課程) complete (written) initial essay ideas               7.5
    6 326 student ideas about their essays;Fischbach2013OutcomeSesLuxembourg_pisa06_basicStatistics_LID each student oral 10 min for essay ideas; the paper write essays; read the paper; one student prepars briefs review; write essays 2 5 3 3 4.5
    7 402 Marsh2013validityMathSciAffect ArabAnglo_timss07_cfa_JEP same as above same as above same above 2 * 3 3 4.5
    8 409 Chiu2023Msc3GenderMachFamilyPBS_EJPE_MCS_path same as above same as above same above 2 * 3 3 4.5
    9 416 Chiu2020ExploringModelsForIncreasing_pisa12_mediate SEM_ETRD same as above same as above same above 2 * 3 3 4.5
    10 423 Chiu2012_IE_BFLPE_combine_timss03_hlm_JEP same as above same as above same above 2 * 3 3 4.5
    11 430(withdraw by) Wang2023timss2019EastAsiaMathAch_randomForest_IJSME same as above same as above same above 2 * 3 3 4.5
    12 507 midterm essay (until Method) oral presentation and feedback S oral present,discussion prepare presentation analysis, essay 6 3 3 3 4.5
    13 514 case study 1 (basic statistics) Student present,hands-on,discussion prepare presentation analysis, essay     3 3 4.5
    14 521 case study 2 (cfa) same as above same as above same as above     * 3 4.5
    15 528 case study 3 (sem) same as above same as above same as above     * 3 4.5
    16 604 case study 4 (hlm) same as above same as above same as above     * 3 4.5
    17 611 (彈性課程) essay draft feedback online read peer essays analysis, essay 10       7.5
    18 618(final exam) oral presentation; final essay complete online write essay essay revision 25 10 3 3 4.5
            Total score 110 53 18 39    

    授課方式Teaching Approach

    10%

    講述 Lecture

    40%

    討論 Discussion

    20%

    小組活動 Group activity

    30%

    數位學習 E-learning

    0%

    其他: Others:

    評量工具與策略、評分標準成效Evaluation Criteria

    Assessment: essay, oral presentation, essay and weekly journal (view the assessment table for details).

               

    1. For the paper-reading weeks, please ask at least one question for the assigned paper before class. We will discuss at least one of each student's questions first and go for the other questions if we have time.

               

    2. GAI use regulation: Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313.

               

    3. Essay rubric: (http://wid.ndia.org/about/Documents/WID_EssayRubric.pdf);oral presentation rubric (https://www.science.purdue.edu/Current_Students/curriculum_and_degree_requirements/oral_rubrics_gray.pdf)

               

    指定/參考書目Textbook & References

    Chiu, M.-S. (2020). Exploring models for increasing the effects of school information and communication technology use on learning outcomes through outside-school use and socioeconomic status mediation: The Ecological Techno-Process. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 413–436.

       

    Chiu, M.-S. (2012). The internal/external frame of reference model, big-fish-little-pond effect, and combined model for mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 87-107.

       

    Chiu, M.-S. (2023). Gender differences in mathematical achievement development: A family psychobiosocial model. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00674-1

       

    Fischbach, A., Keller, U., Preckel, F., & Brunner, M. (2013). PISA proficiency scores predict educational outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 63-72.

       

    Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abu-Hilal, M. M., Morin, A. J., Abdelfattah, F., Leung, K. C., Xu, M. K., & Nagengast, P. (2013). Factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: A comparison of Arab and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 108-128.

       

    Wang, F., King, R. B., & Leung, S. O. (2023). Why do East Asian students do so well in mathematics? A machine learning study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(3), 691-711.

       

    已申請之圖書館指定參考書目 圖書館指定參考書查詢 |相關處理要點

    書名 Book Title 作者 Author 出版年 Publish Year 出版者 Publisher ISBN 館藏來源* 備註 Note

    維護智慧財產權,務必使用正版書籍。 Respect Copyright.

    課程相關連結Course Related Links

    
                

    課程附件Course Attachments

    課程進行中,使用智慧型手機、平板等隨身設備 To Use Smart Devices During the Class

    Yes

    列印