Type of Credit: Partially Required
Credit(s)
Number of Students
這是一門重視深度而非廣度的專題研究課,討論教學心理學當中幾個比較關鍵的議題,包括:
內在動機:內在動機與心流是學習的關鍵,也是終身學習的基礎,但一般人望文生義,誤解甚多。本門課將深入探討內在vs.外在動機的爭議,內在動機與幸福感的關係,內在動機與外在誘因如何整合,學習動機與目標導向的關係。
人際互動對學習動機的影響:競爭與表現、讚美與動機、讚美與批評、訊息與反饋、社會網絡與社群共學等。
建構與發展:教室互動、貝氏學習、自主學習等
閱讀的材料除了連結主題之外,並涵蓋多樣化的研究方法,包括概念分析、後設分析、實證研究等。學生也可以發展自己的行動研究。
能力項目說明
學生修完本課程之後,能:
(一)掌握當前若干重要的教學心理學議題。
(二)提昇閱讀英文文獻的能力。
(三)尋找博士論文的靈感。
(四)養成探索、研究、創作技能。
評量工具與指標
學習目標與成效 |
評量工具 |
評量指標 |
||||
師生 對話 |
心得 報告 |
小組 討論 |
專題 報告 |
測驗 藍圖 |
評量 尺規 |
|
(一)掌握當前若干重要的教學心理學議題。 |
※ |
※ |
※ |
※ |
|
※ |
(二)提昇閱讀英文文獻的能力。 |
※ |
※ |
※ |
※ |
|
※ |
(三)尋找博士論文的靈感。 |
※ |
※ |
|
※ |
|
※ |
(四)養成探索、研究、創作技能。 |
※ |
※ |
|
※ |
|
※ |
教學週次Course Week | 彈性補充教學週次Flexible Supplemental Instruction Week | 彈性補充教學類別Flexible Supplemental Instruction Type |
---|---|---|
週次 |
課程主題 |
課程內容與指定閱讀 (打「*」者為必讀,其餘為選讀) |
教學活動 與作業 |
學習時間 |
|
課堂 |
課後 |
||||
2/22 |
導論
|
課程介紹、進度安排、期初座談 導論:教育的本質、學生中心取向、素養、人性、科技
|
活動:講述、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
2/29 |
內在vs.外在動機:後設分析與辯證 |
*Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education : Reconsidered Once Again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), pp.1-27. *Cameron, J. (2001). Negative Effects of Reward on Intrinsic Motivation— A Limited Phenomenon. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), pp.29-42. |
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
3/7 |
讚美與動機:傳統文獻探討
|
*Henderlong, J. & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The Effects of Praise on Children’s Intrinsic Motivation: A Review and Synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), pp.774-795. 詹志禹, 2013.06, "一個孩子就有一個亮點," 親子天下, No.46, pp.58-60. |
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
3/14 |
讚美與批評:環環相扣的實驗
|
*Moller, J. (2005). Paradoxical effects of praise and criticism: social, dimensional and temporal comparisons. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 275-295. 詹志禹, 2012.12, "讚美的風險," 親子天下, No.41, pp.90-91. |
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
3/21 |
內在動機、幸福感、心流:SDT的應用
|
*Deci, Edward L; Ryan, Richard M. (2008). Facilitating Optimal Motivation and Psychological Well-Being Across Life's Domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-34. *Rigby, C. S. and Ryan, R. M. (2018). Self-Determination Theory in Human Resource Development: New Directions and Practical Considerations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 20(2), 133–147. 詹志禹, 2012.11, "堅持興趣,叛逆有理," 親子天下, No.40, pp.90-91. 詹志禹, 2012.08, "找到心流,就能學而不倦," 親子天下, No.37, pp.86-88. |
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
3/28 |
內在動機與外在誘因整合:以後設分析驗證假設 |
*Cerasoli, C. P. & Nicklin, J. M. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008. 詹志禹, 2012.07, "哪種獎賞最管用?," 親子天下, No.36, pp.64-66. |
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:預讀
|
3 |
4.5〜6 |
4/4 |
|
校際活動週(春假) |
|
3 |
4.5〜6 |
4/11 |
競爭與表現:後設分析+實證研究
|
*Murayama, K. & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The Competition–Performance Relation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Test of the Opposing Processes Model of Competition and Performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1035–1070. 詹志禹, 2013.05, "拿手足互相比較的代價," 親子天下, No.45. |
活動:講述、問答、討論 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
4/18 |
(自選專題) |
專題研究期中進度分享並獲取反饋 |
活動:口頭報告與討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
4/25 |
訊息反饋:後設分析之後設分析
|
*Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. 詹志禹, 2013.01, "如何用回饋引導學習," 親子天下, No.42, pp.58-59. |
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
5/2 |
情境認知&體現認知 |
*Roth, W. M. & Jornet, A. (2013). Situated cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4, 463–478. N. J.: John Wiley & Sons. *(自主蒐尋與選擇喜歡的材料,關鍵字:Embodied cognition或Embodied learning或 Embodiment)
|
活動:發表、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
5/9 |
創造力、批判思考、理性、智慧 |
(自主蒐尋與選擇喜歡的材料,並參考詹志禹「創造力心理學專題研究」教學大綱所列材料) (關鍵字:creativity, creative thinking, critical thinking, rationality, wisdom)
|
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
5/16 |
建構論 |
*Hardy, M. & Taylor, P.C. (1997). Von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism: A critical review. Science & Education, 6, 135-150. *Taber, Keith S. (2010 July 6) Constructivism and Direct Instruction as Competing Instructional Paradigms: An Essay Review of Tobias and Duffy‘s Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? Education Review, 13(8). Retrieved from http://www.edrev.info/essays/v13n8index.html (入門級) 詹志禹, 2013.09, "你誤解「建構學習」了嗎?" 親子天下, No.49, |
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:發表準備 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
5/23 |
目的、品格、使命感與學習 |
*Malin, H., Liauw, I., & Damon, W. (2017). Purpose and Character Development in Early Adolescence. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 46, 1200–1215. 威廉•戴蒙(2013)。邁向目的之路——幫助孩子發現生命的召喚。台北:親子天下。 |
活動:講述、問答、討論
作業:預讀 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
5/30 |
自主學習 情意教育 |
(自主蒐尋與選擇喜歡的材料) (關鍵字:autonomous learning, self-regulated learning, self-directed learning, affective education)
(作業:彙整並繳交學習週記) |
活動:發表、討論
作業:週記 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
6/6 |
自選專題 |
專題研究期末報告:口頭分享並獲取回饋。 (2週內繳交專題書面報告) |
活動: 發表
作業:寫作 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
6/13 |
期末總結 |
回顧與展望 |
探索 |
3 |
4.5〜6 |
6/20 |
彈性授課 |
個別化互動。繳交專題書面報告。 |
晤談 |
3 |
|
主題、重點摘要、生活連結、工作連結、研究連結、印象深刻之處或延伸探索等。每週以不超過一頁為原則,於期末彙整成一份,6/1繳交。
專題來源至少有三種可能性:
其他說明:
文獻資料已詳列於前述每週課程進度。
其它相關文獻:
Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Complex Constructivism: A Theoretical Model of Complexity and Cognition. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 485-498. (挑戰級)
Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning, mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1085-1108. (挑戰級)
Green, S. K., & Gredler, M. E. (2002). A review and analysis of constructivism for school-based practice. School Psychology Review,31, pp.53-70.
Fahim, M. & Eslamdoost, S. (2015). Embodiment: A Brief Overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(1). doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.73
Farina, M. (2021). Embodied cognition: dimensions, domains and applications. Adaptive Behavior, 29(1), 73–88.
Foglia, L. & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1226.
George Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining Embodied Cognition Results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4 , 773–785.
Leitan, N. D. & Chaffey, L. C. (2014). Embodied cognition and its applications: A brief review. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain & Culture, 2-10. Randi, J.(2004).Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record, 106,9 , pp.1825-1853.
Skulmowski, A. & Rey, G. D. (2018).: introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9Wrzus,c., Hänel, M., Wagner, J. & Neyer, F. J. (2012). Social Network Changes and Life Events Across the Life Span: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 53–80.
Chia, L. -W., Wang, C. K. -J., Tan, O. -S., Ee, J., & Koh, C. (2009). Understanding students' motivation in project work: A 2×2 achievement goal approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 87-106.
Feldman, A. F. & Matjasko, J. L. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 159-210.
Gijbels, D., et. al. (2005).Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis From the Angle of Assessment. Review of Education Research,75(1), pp.27-61.
Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-20.
詹志禹(2005)。討論法融入大學統計教學之行動研究。當代教育研究,13(4),167-208。
書名 Book Title | 作者 Author | 出版年 Publish Year | 出版者 Publisher | ISBN | 館藏來源* | 備註 Note |
---|