Type of Credit: Elective
Credit(s)
Number of Students
This course discovers various forms of political participation and social movements through deploying theories of political participation and social movements and applying them to empirical cases around the world. It also discovers the reasons, conditions and factors that make possible political participation and social movements as well as analyzes the outcomes of participation and social movements. Students enable to Understand the relationship between participation, movements and democratic governance. |
能力項目說明
“People’s power” is a chant frequently heard at many public rallies. Yet, what motivates people to act collectively? And, are their efforts likely to be successful? Is there such a thing as "people power" that matters to how we explain the political, economic, and social change? This course aims to introduce students to various forms of political participation and social movements. It adopts a broad definition of political participation and seeks to examine, on the one hand, the conditions and outcomes of political participation at large and social movements in particular. We will compare and contrast certain of these movements with their counterparts in other countries. For all, we will identify the reasons for their successes and failures. |
Course Arrangement
*The classes are divided into two parts – lecture and in-class activity
Lecture |
Topics |
In-class activity |
1
|
Housekeeping & Introduction
Readings Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4)216–22.
van Deth, Jan W. (2016) What is Political Participation? Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Available from: http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-68. Russell J. Dalton. 2008. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 5th ed. Washington: CQ Press. Chapter 3.
Dalton, Russell J. , “Is citizen participation actually good for democracy?”, British Politics and Policy, London School of Economics and Politics Science, available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/is-citizen-participation-actually-good-for-democracy/?utm_content=buffer29030&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer (25 August 2017).
Cox, Laurence. (2018) “Focus: Why Social Movements Matter?”, Discover Society. Available from: https://discoversociety.org/2018/11/06/focus-why-social-movements-matter/?fbclid=IwAR0uSA77FjNnEpiUQLiGJipSwAOJgqYuXHxTYth-CTsjB9SbkIkToYSlM5k (6 November 2018)
|
Nil. |
2
|
Why People Participate? Who participates and who does not?
Readings Hibbing, John and Elizabeth Theiss-Morris. 2005. “Citizenship and Civic Engagement”, Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 8 Issue 1: 227-249. Russell J. Dalton. 2008. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 5th ed. Washington: CQ Press. Ch 4.
Mettler, Suzanne and Joe Soss. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 2(1):55-73.
Teorell, Jan. 2006. "Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda." European Journal of Political Research 45 (5):787-810.
|
Discussion 1 |
3
|
What is a Social Movement? When and why do movements emerge…and decline?
Readings Tarrow, Sidney (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-27.
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965, pp. 5-52.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1993. “Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention.” Social Science History Vol. 17 (2): 281-307.
Gamson, William A. and Gadi Wolfsfeld. 1993. “Movements and Media as Interacting Systems.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528:114-125.
|
Discussion 2 |
4
|
Impacts of social movement & policy change - How social movements matter? Do they make a difference? Readings Whittier, N. (2004) The Consequences of Social Movements for Each Other, in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (eds D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule and H. Kriesi), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. Giugni, Marco G. 1998. “Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:371-393.
Meyer, David S. 2003. “How Social Movements Matter.” Contexts Vol. 2 (4): 30-35. Amenta, Edwin, Neal Caren, Elizabeth Chiarello, and Yang Su. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36:287-307.
Burstein, P. 1999. “Social Movements and Public Policy”, in How Social Movements Matter (eds Giugni, M. & Mcadam, D. & Tilly, C.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
|
Discussion 3 |
5
|
Participation in International Politics - Debate: Power of transnational social movement vs. “the dangers” of global civil society
Readings Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. (1999), Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51: 89–101.
Elyachar, Julia. "Empowerment Money: The World Bank, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Value of Culture in Egypt.” Public Culture 14, no.3:493-513.
Howell, Jude, and Jenny Pearce. "Manufacturing Civil Society from the Outside: Donor Interventions." Chapter 5 in Civil Society and Development. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.
Fisher, William. "Doing Good? The Politics and Antipolitics of NGO Practices." Annual Review of Anthropology 26 (1997): 439-464.
Smith, Jackie. "Bridging Global Divides?". International Sociology 17, no. 4 (2002): 505-28.
|
Discussion 4
|
6 |
Environment movements
Readings Dwivedi, R. 2001. “Environmental Movements in the Global South: Issues of Livelihood and Beyond”, International Sociology, 16(1):11-31.
|
Discussion 5 |
7
|
Social Movement & Democratization - Case of South Korea Readings Garretón, Manuel Antonio. "Social Movements and Democratization." In Social Movements in Development: The Challenge of Globalization and Democratization, edited by Staffan Lindberg and Árni Sverrisson, 67-77. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1997. della Porta, D. 2013. Democracy and Social Movements. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Kim, Sunhyuk. "Civil Society and Democratization in South Korea." Korea Journal 38, no. 2 (1998): 214-36. Shin, G.W. and Chang, P. Y. eds (2011), South Korean Social Movements: From Democracy to Civil Society. Oxon: Routledge.
|
Discussion 6 |
8 |
Democratization and retreat
Readings Ngok, M. (2008), “ Civil Society and Democratization in Hong Kong Paradox and Duality”. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 4, No.2: 155-175 Stephan Ortmann (2015), “The Umbrella Movement and Hong Kong’s Protracted Democratization Process”, Asian Affairs, 46:1, 32-50, DOI: 10.1080/03068374.2014.994957 Francis Lee (2020) Solidarity in the Anti-Extradition Bill movement in Hong Kong, Critical Asian Studies, 52:1, 18-32
|
Discussion 7 |
9
|
Elite and State response and counter-movements
Readings David S. Meyer and Suzanne Staggenborg. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology, pp.1628-1660.
Carey, S.C. 2006. “The Dynamic Relationship between Protest and Repression”, Political Research Quarterly, 59(1):1-11.
della porta, D. and Fillieule, O. (2004) Policing Social Protest, in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (eds D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule and H. Kriesi), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.
King, M & Widdington (2013) “Riots and social protest in an age of austerity”, Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 23:1, 1-5
GIllham, P., Edwards, B. & Noakes J. (2013) “Strategic incapacitation and policing the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York City 2011”, Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 23:1, 81-102
Body-Gendrot, S. (2013) “Urban Violence in France and England: comparing Paris 2005 and London 2011”, Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 23:1, 6-25.
|
N/A |
10
|
Social Movement in authoritarian regime -Case of China
Readings
Wong, Natalie W.M. (2016) “Environmental protests and NIMBY activism: Local politics and waste management in Beijing and Guangzhou”, China Information, 30(2):143-164.
Xi Chen (2012), Social Protest ad Contentious Authoritarianism in China (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press), Chapter 5. Andrew Mertha (2008), China’s Water Warriors: Citizen Action and Policy Change (Cornell Cornell University Press), Chapters 5 & 6. Lianjiang Li and Kevin O’Brien (2008), “Protest Leadership in Rural China,” China Quarterly, 193: 1-23. Xi Chen and Ping Xu (2011), “From Resistance to Advocacy: Political Representation for Disabled People in China,” China Quarterly, 207: 649-667.]
|
Discussion 8 |
11 |
The Role of the Media
Readings
Smith, Jackie, John D. McCarthy, Clark McPhail and Boguslaw Augustyn. (2001). “From Protest to Agenda Building: Description Bias in Media Coverage of Protest Events in Washington, D.C.” Social Forces 79(4): 1397-1423.
Barker-Plummer, Bernadette and David Barker-Plummer. (2017). "Twitter as a Feminist Resource: #YesAllWomen, Digital Platforms, and Discursive Social Change" Pp. 91-118 in Social Movements and Media Studies (Studies in Media and Communications, Vol. 14), edited by Jennifer Earl and D.A. Rohlinger. Emerald Publishing.
Marx Ferree, M. and McClurg Mueller, C. (2004) “Feminism and the Women's Movement: A Global Perspective”, in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (eds D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule and H. Kriesi), Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.
|
Discussion 9 |
12 |
From Civil Rights Movements to Black Live Matter
Readings:
McAdam, D. , Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. Excerpts of Chapter 7. (Pp.146-147; 149-152; 156-161; 162-163; 166; 169- 180)
Garza, Alicia. “A Herstory of the #BlackLivesMatter Movement.” Feminist Wire, October 7, 2014. (http://www.thefeministwire.com/2014/10/blacklivesmatter-2/)
|
Discussion 10 |
13 |
Anti-capitalist movement: Occupy Wall Street
Readings:
Wright, E.O. 2018. “ How to be an Anti-capitalist for the 21st Century” ( https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/How%20to%20be%20an%20anticapitalist%20for%20the%2021st%20century%20--%20full%20draft,%20July%2025%202018.pdf)
Calhoun, C. (2013), Occupy Wall Street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 64: 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12002
|
Discussion 11 |
14 |
What Makes a Social Movement Successful?
Readings: McCammon, Holly J., Karen E. Campbell, Ellen M. Granberg and Christine Mowery. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and U.S. Women’s Surage Movements, 1866 to 1919.”American Sociological Review 66(1):49-70.
Gamson, William A. (2015). “Defining Movement “Success”” Pp. 383-385 in The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, 3rd Ed, edited by Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Pellow, David N and Robert J. Brulle. (2015) “Environmental Justice.” Pp. 391-397 in The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, 3rd Ed, edited by Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Stephan, Maria J. and Erica Chenoweth. (2008). “Why civil resistance works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict.” International Security, 33(1): 7-44.
|
Discussion 12 |
15 |
Doing Social Movement Research
Readings:
Lichterman, Paul. (2001). “Seeing Structure Happen: Theory-Driven Participant Observation,” in Suzanne Staggenborg and Bert Klandermans (eds), Methods of Social Movement Research. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, pp. 118–45.
Balsiger, Philip and Alexandre Lambelet. (2014). “Participant Observation” Pp. 144-172 in Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by Donatella della Porta. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lindekilde, Lisa. (2014). “Discourse and Frame Analysis: In-Depth Analysis of Qualitative Data in Social Movement Research” Pp. 195-227 in Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by Donatella della Porta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
Discussion 13 |
16 |
Class Presentations (I)
|
|
17
|
Class Presentations (II) |
|
18
|
Class presentation (III) |
|
In-class activity: Class discussion
|
Discussion Topics |
Lecture 2 |
How and why do we participate in public life? How do we get drawn into community and political affairs? |
Lecture 3 |
What are the best ways to sustain a social movement? How do we achieve them? Please give example(s) and explain. |
Lecture 4 |
What are the most important social movements today? How are these different movements portrayed in the media? Please pick a case and explain. |
Lecture 5 |
What is the “best strategy” for making your voices heard and influencing policy-making today? Please give example(s) and explain.
|
Lecture 6 |
How does social movement today extend beyond national boundaries and become, in effect, global social movement? Please explain with case(s).
|
Lecture 7 |
Do Minorities really face greater exposure to environmental risks? Do poor and minority populations suffer disproportionately from exposure to toxic materials? Please give an example for elaboration.
|
Lecture 8 |
Are the concepts of civil society and social capital important to organize social movement? Please explain with case(s). |
Lecture 10 |
How do identities, such as class, race, gender, and sexual orientation, shape social movement? Please explain with case(s).
|
Lecture 11 |
Is democracy in decline? Is the concern about democratic decline in recent years overblown? What’s the evidence to support our claims?
|
Lecture 12 |
What do you think about the latest development of social movement? How far does it affect perception and strategy work out by the law enforcement agencies? Please explain with case(s). |
Lecture 13 |
To what extent can the public influence policymaking in China? Why is it important that their voices are heard by the government? Please pick a case and explain.
|
Lecture 14 |
How is the global expansion of social media likely to change how people pursue social change? How has it done so already? |
Lecture 15 |
One of the key tactics of the Civil Rights Movement was the widespread use of civil disobedience. What is meant by civil disobedience? When can it be effective? |
Seminar schedule & arrangement
General guidelines for in-class activity, group presentation and discussion:
In-class activity
Students (with 3-4 people in each group) are required to give an informal presentation to share their opinions on the discussion topics. Each presentation should not more than 10 minutes. Q & A will be followed after each of the presentation.
Group presentation
Students with the same group are required to give a 20-minute presentation on social movements, mobilization, or participation within a self-selected international, national or local context. The presenters will then lead a 10-20 minutes discussion of the case. The goal of the discussion is to examine how the case relates to and illustrates key course themes and readings. Three or four questions should also be prepared in advance that will guide the discussion.
Please also prepare a presentation PowerPoint and submit to the course instructor two days before the presentation.
Individual Essay
Students are required to submit an individual paper (around 3000 words; not include references and notes).
Make sure your essay has a cover page and please include the following information; your full name (underline your surname), and student ID.
Please choose a topic (or same topic in the class presentation with different perspectives) and submit it on or before 12 June 2022. All answers to the questions should be supported by arguments, facts and scholarly work. References and citations should be made clearly.
Guidelines for the Case Study |
This report presents an illustrative case concerning a particular social action/ political participation in local or global context. A case study analysis requires you to investigate a selected case study and discuss with supporting evidences, as well as course reading(s). The goal of the discussion is to examine how the case relates to and illustrates key course themes and readings. Plagiarism, in any form, is strictly prohibited by the university policy. Reports found plagiarism receive zero point. Students may use the following format in their case study. Deciding the Topic Consult your topic ideas with the tutor. Potential topics need to address a social action/ political participation. As you probably realize already, access to information is key in the success of your case study. Materials helping you to write your cases can come from government documents, newspapers, or your personal experiences through interviews or field study. Before writing Before you begin writing, follow these guidelines to help you prepare and understand the case study, and more information and example cases could be provided by individual tutors in response to student needs.
The format Once you have gathered the necessary information, a draft of your analysis should include these sections:
We expect an essay with 3,000 words. A Reference Section that includes all articles cited in the report should be at the end of the project. Students can choose to use either American Psychological Association (APA) or Chicago Style of manuscript preparation or any other academic or research referencing style in preparation of the reference section. Your grade is based on the fulfillment of these requirements, the reasoning and rigor of your work, and the quality of your writing. The report will be due 11:59pm on the last day of the semester on or before 12 June 2022. NO late report is acceptable. |
*** Citing and Acknowledging Sources
In accordance with the University policy, all work must follow the scholarly procedures of full documentation, acknowledging all references and sources consulted. Written work that does not meet minimum standards of documentation will fail automatically.
Supplementary readings
1. |
Alan Scott, Kate Nash, Anna Marie Smith (eds.), 2009. New critical writings in political sociology, Farnham: Ashgate. [3 vol.] |
2. |
Mancur Olson, 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. |
3. |
Benford, Robert D. and Snow, David A., 2000, “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment”, Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-639. |
4. |
Goodwin, J. and Japser, J. (eds.), 2004. Rethinking social movements. Structure, meaning, and emotion, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield publishers. |
5. |
Flesher, Cristina and Cox, Laurence (eds.), 2013. Understanding European Movements. New social movements, global justice struggles, anti-austerity protest, Abingdon: Routledge. |
6. |
Kuah-Pearce, Khun Eng and Guiheux, Gilles (eds), 2009. Social movements in China and Hong Kong. The expansion of protest space. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. |
Journals:
Social Movement Studies, Government and Opposition, Mobilization: An International Quarterly
Evaluation/ Assessment tasks |
Weighting (%) |
Lectures participation (10% for class participation; 10% for in-class activities)
|
20% |
Individual Essay (around 3,000 words)
|
50% |
Group presentation
|
30% |
Total: |
100% |
Required Readings |
Della Porta, D and Mario D (1999) Social Movements: An Introduction (Oxford, UK and Mass, USA: Blackwell Publishers). Goodwin, J. and Japser, J. (2012) Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest (Stanford: Stanford University Press). Tarrow, S (2011) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (Third Edition) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Tilly, C. and Tarrow, S. (2007) Contentious Politics (Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers). |