Type of Credit: Elective
Credit(s)
Number of Students
近十年來，在全球各地，城市空間的生產與研究產生了極大程度的變革。隨著阿拉伯之春、佔領華爾街與西班牙的15M 等運動在全球城市點燃新一波的公民運動，城市公共空間的政治功能與意涵重新獲得重視；同時，在全球經濟蕭條的困境中，戰術性的城市改造運動，為發展停滯的城市注入一股活力。在這過程中，過去所依循之正規的城市發展手法受到挑戰；相反的，非正式甚至是游擊式的手段成了城市突破法規與財務困境的途徑。
有別於先前著重於全球化以及新自由主義下空間私有化的城市論述，這一波的城市運動則顯現出公民社會的主體性與作用力。當然，這一波的轉變並非是單一或同質的，過程中仍然可以看到各種勢力與觀念的角力，而國家體制與市場經濟的決定性影響也依然存在。作為這一波城市再造運動的主角，公民社會的有那些可能性與局限？有哪些案例值得我們深入探討、學習？公民城市的崛起，是否能帶來任何結構性的轉變？作為城市規劃與設計的專業者，我們在這新一波運動中的角色是什麼？專業者需要什麼樣的理論架構與工具來釐清這些「新」的城市再造手法？本門演講課將以這過去十年間竄起的幾個主要的論述與案例為基礎，以不同的主題與關鍵詞為架構，來探討這一波運動中所反映出城市空間的轉變與規劃論述的發展。
Over the past decade, the mode of spatial production and research of cities around the world have experienced a remarkable shift. The rise of citizen movements such as the Arab Spring, Occupy Wall Street, and the 15M Movement in Spring has rekindled the political instrumentality of public space. During the global economic recession, tactical urbanism interventions became a method of reinvigorating the stagnant cities. Unlike the previous obsession with globalization, neoliberalism, and privatization, the focus of recent discourses has been on the subjectivity and agency of citizens and the emergence of civic urbanism. Still, the shift has been uneven and with mixed results, reflecting contesting forces and continued roles of the state and the market. In this context, what structural changes are possible under the emerging civic urbanism? As urban design and planning professionals, what are our roles in the movement? What conceptual framework and tools are needed to support a new way of city-making? Using keywords and a thematic framework, this course will build on the discourses and cases from the past decade to explore these shifts in planning theories and placemaking.
能力項目說明
• 認識城市空間生產的政治過程與公民社會的作用
• 理解新一波城市再造的時空與論述背景
• 檢驗城市再造公民運動中專業者所扮演的角色
• 探討以公民社會為核心的城市再造論述與行動
• Recognize the political process of city making and agency of civil society.
• Comprehend the context and theoretical underpinnings of the recent city-making
discourses.
• Examine the role of planning and design professionals in the emerging civic
urbanism.
• Explore the discourses and actions of civic urbanism.
各週主題（暫定）：
1. 課程概述 Course overview
2. 現代城市的論述與生產 Making of Contemporary Urbanism
3. 參與式規劃的發展與困境 Design as democracy?
4. 日常城市主義 Everyday Urbanism
5. 空間鬆綁 Loose Space
6. 佔領/城市抵抗與公共空間 Occupy/ Urban Resistance & Public Space
7. DIY/戰術/暫時性城市主義 DIY/Tactical/Temporary Urbanisms
8. 城市游擊主義 Guerrilla Urbanism
9. 城市混雜主義 Messy Urbanism
10. 城市情感主義 Affective Urbanism
11. 文資行動主義 Heritage Activism
12. 城市共生與封閉 Urban Commons & Enclosures
13. 城市農耕主義 Agro-Urbanism
14. 游擊韌性 Guerrilla Resilience
15. 城市學習主義 Pedagogical Urbanism
16. 回顧與總結Review & conclusions
課程操作方式將以講課以及討論為主，學生作業有三，包括：公民城市主義案例整理、現場觀察紀錄，以及一篇研究報告。The course format will consist of weekly lectures and in-class discussions. The assignments will include a case study of civic urbanism, an observation report, and a term paper.
公民城市主義案例整理 Civic Urbanism Case Study Report (20%)
現場觀察紀錄 Site/Activity Observation Report (20%)
研究報告 Research paper (40%)
課堂參與 Class participation (20%)
Readings:
Crawford, Margaret. 1999. Introduction. In Everyday Urbanism.
Douglas, Gordon CC. (2014). Do-It-Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal “Improvement” through Unauthorized Alteration. City and Community 13(1): 5-25.*
Francis, Mark. 1999. “Proactive Practice: Visionary Thought and Participatory Action in Environmental Design,” Places 12(2)
Franck, Karen A. and Quentin Stevens. 2007. Tying Down Loose Space. In Loose Space.
Hall, Peter. 1996. The City of Dreadful Night. In Cities of Tomorrow.
Hester, Randolph T. 1999. A Refrain with a View, Places 12(2).
Hou, Jeffrey. 2010. Citizen Design: Participation and Beyond. In Companion to Urban Design.
Hou, Jeffrey. 2010. (Not) your everyday public space. In Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities.
Hou, Jeffrey, and Manish Chalana. (2016). Untangling the Messy Asian City. In Chalana, Manish, and Jeffrey Hou. (eds.), Messy Urbanism: Understanding the “Other” Cities of Asia, 1-21.
Hou, Jeffrey and Michael Rios. 2003. Community-driven Placemaking: the Social Practice of Participatory Design in the Making of Union Point Park. Journal of Architectural Education, 57 (1)
Jacobs, Jane. 1992. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. (Excerpt)
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. 1999. “Performing the City: Reflections on the Urban Vernacular.” In Everyday Urbanism.
Lydon, Mike, and Garcia, Anthony. (2015). Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change. (Excerpt)
Platt, Rutherford H. 1994. From Commons to Commons: Evolving Concepts of Open Space in North American Cities. In The Ecological City.
Urban Catalysts (2006). Pattern of the Unplanned. In Franck, Karen A., and Quentin Stevens (eds.), Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life.
Textbook: None